FBTC.TO vs. SOLL.TO
FBTC.TO (Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF) and SOLL.TO (Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FBTC.TO returned -37.95% vs -56.21% for SOLL.TO. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FBTC.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for SOLL.TO.
Performance
FBTC.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBTC.TO achieves a -24.39% return, which is significantly higher than SOLL.TO's -42.41% return.
FBTC.TO
- 1D
- -2.22%
- 1M
- -16.83%
- YTD
- -24.39%
- 6M
- -30.03%
- 1Y
- -37.95%
- 3Y*
- 34.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOLL.TO
- 1D
- -4.68%
- 1M
- -14.73%
- YTD
- -42.41%
- 6M
- -50.32%
- 1Y
- -56.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBTC.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FBTC.TO Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF | -24.39% | 2.40% |
SOLL.TO Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units | -42.41% | -7.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBTC.TO and SOLL.TO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2025 | 0.85 |
The correlation between FBTC.TO and SOLL.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBTC.TO vs. SOLL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FBTC.TO
SOLL.TO
FBTC.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) and Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBTC.TO | SOLL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.88 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | -0.79 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | -1.24 | -0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBTC.TO | SOLL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | -0.78 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | -0.61 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
FBTC.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBTC.TO drawdown since its inception was -70.77%, roughly equal to the maximum SOLL.TO drawdown of -71.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC.TO and SOLL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBTC.TO | SOLL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.77% | -71.52% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.22% | -71.52% | +21.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.38% | -71.52% | +23.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.94% | -34.60% | +3.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.18% | 45.19% | -16.01% |
Volatility
FBTC.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) is 9.72%, while Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO) has a volatility of 16.48%. This indicates that FBTC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOLL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBTC.TO | SOLL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.72% | 16.48% | -6.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.63% | 50.24% | -16.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.84% | 72.62% | -29.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.37% | 71.16% | -18.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.37% | 71.16% | -18.79% |
FBTC.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBTC.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SOLL.TO's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBTC.TO vs. SOLL.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither FBTC.TO nor SOLL.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FBTC.TO and SOLL.TO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FBTC.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FBTC.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SOLL.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Purpose Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FBTC.TO and 1.00% for SOLL.TO.
Find the right allocation for FBTC.TO and SOLL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer