PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOLL.TO vs. KILO-B.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOLL.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOLL.TO achieves a -42.41% return, which is significantly lower than KILO-B.TO's 4.14% return.


SOLL.TO

1D
-4.68%
1M
-14.73%
YTD
-42.41%
6M
-50.32%
1Y
-56.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KILO-B.TO

1D
-0.46%
1M
0.62%
YTD
4.14%
6M
5.05%
1Y
34.09%
3Y*
32.71%
5Y*
21.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOLL.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SOLL.TO and KILO-B.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2025

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOLL.TO vs. KILO-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOLL.TO
SOLL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
SOLL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOLL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOLL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
SOLL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOLL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

KILO-B.TO
KILO-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
KILO-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KILO-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
KILO-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
KILO-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
KILO-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOLL.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SOLL.TOKILO-B.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.28

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

1.97

-2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.24

4.86

-6.10

SOLL.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOLL.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is lower than the KILO-B.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOLL.TO and KILO-B.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SOLL.TOKILO-B.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.78

1.37

-2.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.61

1.20

-1.81

Drawdowns

SOLL.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOLL.TO drawdown since its inception was -71.52%, which is greater than KILO-B.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLL.TO and KILO-B.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOLL.TOKILO-B.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.52%

-22.54%

-48.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.52%

-17.41%

-54.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.52%

-15.47%

-56.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.60%

-7.72%

-26.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

45.19%

7.04%

+38.15%

Volatility

SOLL.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.48% compared to Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) at 5.43%. This indicates that SOLL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KILO-B.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOLL.TOKILO-B.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.48%

5.43%

+11.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.24%

21.50%

+28.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.62%

25.07%

+47.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.16%

16.84%

+54.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.16%

17.99%

+53.17%

SOLL.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOLL.TO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than KILO-B.TO's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOLL.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither SOLL.TO nor KILO-B.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
KILO-B.TO
Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.69%
SOLL.TO
Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SOLL.TO and KILO-B.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KILO-B.TO is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KILO-B.TO is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SOLL.TO.

SOLL.TO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while KILO-B.TO is Gold. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SOLL.TO and 0.28% for KILO-B.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOLL.TO and KILO-B.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer