SOLL.TO vs. KILO-B.TO
SOLL.TO (Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units) and KILO-B.TO (Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - SOLL.TO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Purpose Investments, while KILO-B.TO is a Gold fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SOLL.TO returned -56.21% vs 34.09% for KILO-B.TO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOLL.TO charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for KILO-B.TO.
Performance
SOLL.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOLL.TO achieves a -42.41% return, which is significantly lower than KILO-B.TO's 4.14% return.
SOLL.TO
- 1D
- -4.68%
- 1M
- -14.73%
- YTD
- -42.41%
- 6M
- -50.32%
- 1Y
- -56.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KILO-B.TO
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- 1Y
- 34.09%
- 3Y*
- 32.71%
- 5Y*
- 21.87%
- 10Y*
- —
SOLL.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOLL.TO Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units | -42.41% | -7.64% |
KILO-B.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged | 4.14% | 27.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOLL.TO and KILO-B.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2025 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOLL.TO vs. KILO-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SOLL.TO
KILO-B.TO
SOLL.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOLL.TO | KILO-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.28 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 1.97 | -2.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 4.86 | -6.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOLL.TO | KILO-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.78 | 1.37 | -2.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.61 | 1.20 | -1.81 |
Drawdowns
SOLL.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOLL.TO drawdown since its inception was -71.52%, which is greater than KILO-B.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLL.TO and KILO-B.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOLL.TO | KILO-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.52% | -22.54% | -48.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.52% | -17.41% | -54.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.52% | -15.47% | -56.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.60% | -7.72% | -26.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.19% | 7.04% | +38.15% |
Volatility
SOLL.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Volatility Comparison
Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units (SOLL.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.48% compared to Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged (KILO-B.TO) at 5.43%. This indicates that SOLL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KILO-B.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOLL.TO | KILO-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.48% | 5.43% | +11.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.24% | 21.50% | +28.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.62% | 25.07% | +47.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.16% | 16.84% | +54.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.16% | 17.99% | +53.17% |
SOLL.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOLL.TO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than KILO-B.TO's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOLL.TO vs. KILO-B.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither SOLL.TO nor KILO-B.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KILO-B.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund ETF Non-Currency Hedged | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% |
SOLL.TO Purpose Solana ETF Currency Hedged Units | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOLL.TO and KILO-B.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KILO-B.TO is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KILO-B.TO is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SOLL.TO.
SOLL.TO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while KILO-B.TO is Gold. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SOLL.TO and 0.28% for KILO-B.TO.
Find the right allocation for SOLL.TO and KILO-B.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer