PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBTC.TO vs. FBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBTC.TO vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FBTC.TO is traded in CAD, while FBTC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FBTC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with FBTC.TO at -24.39% and FBTC at -24.39%.


FBTC.TO

1D
-2.22%
1M
-16.83%
YTD
-24.39%
6M
-30.03%
1Y
-37.95%
3Y*
34.59%
5Y*
10Y*

FBTC

1D
-2.25%
1M
-16.74%
YTD
-24.39%
6M
-30.06%
1Y
-37.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBTC.TO vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FBTC.TO
Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF
-24.39%-10.85%114.38%
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
-24.39%-10.84%114.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FBTC.TO and FBTC is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.95

The correlation between FBTC.TO and FBTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBTC.TO vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBTC.TO
FBTC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTC
FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBTC.TO vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBTC.TOFBTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

0.86

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

-0.76

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.30

-1.31

+0.01

FBTC.TO vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is comparable to the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBTC.TO and FBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBTC.TOFBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.89

-0.89

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.34

-0.26

Drawdowns

FBTC.TO vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTC.TO drawdown since its inception was -70.77%, which is greater than FBTC's maximum drawdown of -50.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC.TO and FBTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBTC.TOFBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.77%

-50.18%

-20.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.22%

-50.18%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.38%

-48.17%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.94%

-15.94%

-15.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.18%

28.95%

+0.23%

Volatility

FBTC.TO vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.72% compared to Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) at 9.02%. This indicates that FBTC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBTC.TOFBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.72%

9.02%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.63%

34.04%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.84%

42.90%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.37%

49.47%

+2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.37%

49.47%

+2.90%

FBTC.TO vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTC.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBTC.TO vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

Neither FBTC.TO nor FBTC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FBTC.TO and FBTC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FBTC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FBTC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FBTC.TO.

Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FBTC.TO and 0.25% for FBTC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBTC.TO and FBTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer