PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBTC.TO vs. FBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FBTC.TO vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FBTC.TO vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FBTC.TO
Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF
-21.62%-10.85%114.38%
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust
-21.52%-10.84%114.27%
Different Trading Currencies

FBTC.TO is traded in CAD, while FBTC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FBTC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FBTC.TO having a -21.62% return and FBTC slightly higher at -21.52%.


FBTC.TO

1D
1.70%
1M
5.18%
YTD
-21.62%
6M
-40.83%
1Y
-20.77%
3Y*
33.25%
5Y*
10Y*

FBTC

1D
1.86%
1M
5.33%
YTD
-21.52%
6M
-40.91%
1Y
-20.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FBTC.TO vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTC.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FBTC.TO vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBTC.TO
FBTC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTC
FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBTC.TO vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBTC.TOFBTCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.47

-0.46

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.41

-0.41

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.95

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

-0.43

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.91

-0.92

0.00

FBTC.TO vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is comparable to the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBTC.TO and FBTC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBTC.TOFBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

-0.46

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.40

-0.30

Correlation

The correlation between FBTC.TO and FBTC is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FBTC.TO vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

Neither FBTC.TO nor FBTC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FBTC.TO vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTC.TO drawdown since its inception was -70.77%, which is greater than FBTC's maximum drawdown of -50.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC.TO and FBTC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FBTC.TOFBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.77%

-49.33%

-21.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.22%

-49.33%

-0.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.48%

-46.06%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.53%

-14.12%

-16.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.72%

23.05%

+0.67%

Volatility

FBTC.TO vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC) have volatilities of 13.01% and 12.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FBTC.TOFBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.01%

12.88%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.24%

36.37%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.80%

44.73%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.99%

50.57%

+2.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.99%

50.57%

+2.42%