FBND vs. EVTR

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) and EVTR (Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FBND returned 5.34% vs 5.42% for EVTR. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FBND charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for EVTR.

Performance

FBND vs. EVTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBND achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than EVTR's -0.18% return.

FBND

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -0.69%
• YTD: 0.10%
• 6M: 0.40%
• 1Y: 5.34%
• 3Y*: 4.60%
• 5Y*: 0.68%
• 10Y*: 2.47%

EVTR

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -0.81%
• YTD: -0.18%
• 6M: 0.39%
• 1Y: 5.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBND vs. EVTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF	0.10%	7.57%	2.92%
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF	-0.18%	8.10%	4.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FBND and EVTR is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2024	0.94

The correlation between FBND and EVTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FBND vs. EVTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBND

FBND Risk / Return Rank: 44
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 41
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 40

EVTR

EVTR Risk / Return Rank: 45
EVTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
EVTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
EVTR Omega Ratio Rank: 46
EVTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
EVTR Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBND vs. EVTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBND	EVTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	1.50	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	2.20	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.26	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	1.90	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.97	5.94	+0.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FBND vs. EVTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the EVTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBND and EVTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBND	EVTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41	1.50	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	1.26	-0.83

Drawdowns

FBND vs. EVTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBND drawdown since its inception was -17.25%, which is greater than EVTR's maximum drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBND and EVTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBND	EVTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.25%	-4.08%	-13.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.66%	-2.86%	+0.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.94%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.82%	-1.90%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.35%	-0.97%	-2.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	0.91%	-0.01%

Volatility

FBND vs. EVTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) is 1.23%, while Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) has a volatility of 1.40%. This indicates that FBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EVTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBND	EVTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.23%	1.40%	-0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.75%	2.81%	-0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.80%	3.64%	+0.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.92%	4.31%	+1.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.10%	4.31%	+1.79%

FBND vs. EVTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBND has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than EVTR's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBND vs. EVTR - Dividend Comparison

FBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, which matches EVTR's 4.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF	4.70%	4.51%	4.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF	4.72%	4.70%	4.73%	4.26%	3.07%	1.86%	4.25%	2.90%	2.93%	2.56%	2.84%	3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBND and EVTR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, FBND and EVTR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FBND or EVTR?

EVTR has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to FBND (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBND dropped -17.25% vs EVTR's -4.08%.

Which ETF is better, FBND or EVTR?

On 1-year performance, EVTR leads with 5.42% vs 5.34% for FBND. On fees, EVTR is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, FBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FBND or EVTR?

Over the 1-year period, EVTR has performed better with a 5.42% return vs 5.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBND or EVTR?

EVTR is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FBND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBND or EVTR?

FBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 4.70% for EVTR.

What is the main difference between FBND and EVTR?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FBND and 0.32% for EVTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EVTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.