PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVTR vs. PTRB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVTR vs. PTRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) and PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVTR achieves a -0.42% return, which is significantly higher than PTRB's -0.52% return.


EVTR

1D
-0.28%
1M
-1.24%
6M
-0.76%
YTD
-0.42%
1Y
2.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.94%

PTRB

1D
-0.23%
1M
-1.39%
6M
-0.75%
YTD
-0.52%
1Y
2.24%
3Y*
4.80%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$24.87M$22.94M$25.52M
$8.31M$6.59M$6.62M

EVTR vs. PTRB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EVTR
Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF
-0.42%8.10%4.03%
PTRB
PGIM Total Return Bond ETF
-0.52%7.63%2.92%

Correlation

The correlation between EVTR and PTRB is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2024

0.90

The correlation between EVTR and PTRB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVTR vs. PTRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EVTR
EVTR Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EVTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
EVTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVTR Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

PTRB
PTRB Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PTRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTRB Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PTRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTRB Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EVTR vs. PTRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) and PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EVTRPTRBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.14

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

1.07

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.02

2.69

+0.33

EVTR vs. PTRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVTR Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the PTRB Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVTR and PTRB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EVTR vs. PTRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVTR drawdown since its inception was -4.08%, smaller than the maximum PTRB drawdown of -19.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVTR and PTRB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVTRPTRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-19.17%

+15.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-2.90%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-2.44%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.99%

-7.43%

+6.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

1.16%

-0.10%

Volatility

EVTR vs. PTRB - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) and PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB) have volatilities of 1.08% and 1.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVTRPTRBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

1.04%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.11%

3.18%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.76%

3.94%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.30%

6.19%

-1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.30%

6.19%

-1.89%

EVTR vs. PTRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVTR has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than PTRB's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVTR vs. PTRB - Dividend Comparison

EVTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, less than PTRB's 5.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
EVTR
Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF
4.81%4.51%4.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PTRB
PGIM Total Return Bond ETF
4.77%4.73%5.10%4.62%4.07%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, EVTR and PTRB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EVTR has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to PTRB (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVTR dropped -4.08% vs PTRB's -19.17%.

On 1-year performance, EVTR leads with 2.53% vs 2.24% for PTRB. On fees, EVTR is cheaper at 0.32% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EVTR has performed better with a 2.53% return vs 2.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EVTR is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for PTRB.

EVTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 4.77% for PTRB.

They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for EVTR and 0.49% for PTRB.

EVTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVTR and PTRB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer