EVTR vs. VCOBX
EVTR (Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF) and VCOBX (Vanguard Core Bond Fund Admiral Shares) are both funds - EVTR is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Eaton Vance, while VCOBX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Vanguard. Over the past year, EVTR returned 5.42% vs 4.91% for VCOBX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EVTR charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VCOBX.
Performance
EVTR vs. VCOBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with EVTR at 0.43% and VCOBX at 0.43%.
EVTR
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 5.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VCOBX
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 4.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.84%
- 5Y*
- 0.55%
- 10Y*
- 2.17%
EVTR vs. VCOBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF | 0.43% | 8.10% | 4.07% |
VCOBX Vanguard Core Bond Fund Admiral Shares | 0.43% | 7.73% | 3.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVTR and VCOBX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2024 | 0.94 |
The correlation between EVTR and VCOBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVTR vs. VCOBX — Risk / Return Rank
EVTR
VCOBX
EVTR vs. VCOBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) and Vanguard Core Bond Fund Admiral Shares (VCOBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EVTR | VCOBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.27 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 2.13 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.03 | 6.33 | -0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EVTR | VCOBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 1.52 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.34 | 0.48 | +0.86 |
Drawdowns
EVTR vs. VCOBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVTR drawdown since its inception was -4.08%, smaller than the maximum VCOBX drawdown of -18.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVTR and VCOBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVTR | VCOBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -18.14% | +14.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.86% | -2.62% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -1.41% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.97% | -4.18% | +3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 0.88% | +0.02% |
Volatility
EVTR vs. VCOBX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) has a higher volatility of 1.41% compared to Vanguard Core Bond Fund Admiral Shares (VCOBX) at 1.29%. This indicates that EVTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCOBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVTR | VCOBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | 1.29% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | 2.63% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.66% | 3.67% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.30% | 5.78% | -1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.30% | 4.76% | -0.46% |
EVTR vs. VCOBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVTR has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than VCOBX's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
EVTR vs. VCOBX - Dividend Comparison
EVTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than VCOBX's 4.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF | 4.67% | 4.51% | 4.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VCOBX Vanguard Core Bond Fund Admiral Shares | 4.74% | 4.80% | 5.04% | 4.44% | 3.01% | 1.23% | 3.09% | 3.08% | 3.10% | 2.20% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, EVTR and VCOBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EVTR has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to VCOBX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVTR dropped -4.08% vs VCOBX's -18.14%.
VCOBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EVTR and VCOBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer