PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EVTR vs. FBNDX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


EVTRFBNDX
Daily Std Dev4.96%5.97%
Max Drawdown-3.21%-20.16%
Current Drawdown-3.09%-9.56%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between EVTR and FBNDX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

EVTR vs. FBNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.32%
3.13%
EVTR
FBNDX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EVTR vs. FBNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVTR has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than FBNDX's 0.45% expense ratio.


FBNDX
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund
Expense ratio chart for FBNDX: current value at 0.45% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.45%
Expense ratio chart for EVTR: current value at 0.32% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.32%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EVTR vs. FBNDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) and Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVTR
Sharpe ratio
No data
FBNDX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FBNDX, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FBNDX, currently valued at 1.82, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.82
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FBNDX, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.22
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FBNDX, currently valued at 0.46, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.46
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FBNDX, currently valued at 4.19, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004.19

EVTR vs. FBNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

EVTR vs. FBNDX - Dividend Comparison

EVTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than FBNDX's 3.92% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
EVTR
Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF
3.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FBNDX
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund
3.92%3.56%2.67%1.53%1.88%2.77%2.84%2.17%2.50%2.90%2.59%2.36%

Drawdowns

EVTR vs. FBNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVTR drawdown since its inception was -3.21%, smaller than the maximum FBNDX drawdown of -20.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVTR and FBNDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.09%
-3.56%
EVTR
FBNDX

Volatility

EVTR vs. FBNDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) is 1.50%, while Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) has a volatility of 1.85%. This indicates that EVTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%1.60%1.80%2.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.50%
1.85%
EVTR
FBNDX