EVTR vs. FBNDX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EVTR (Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF) and FBNDX (Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund) are both funds - EVTR is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Eaton Vance, while FBNDX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EVTR returned 5.00% vs 4.11% for FBNDX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EVTR charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FBNDX.

Performance

EVTR vs. FBNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) and Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVTR achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly higher than FBNDX's 0.06% return.

EVTR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 0.51%
• 6M: 0.67%
• 1Y: 5.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBNDX

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 0.06%
• 6M: 0.38%
• 1Y: 4.11%
• 3Y*: 3.98%
• 5Y*: -0.03%
• 10Y*: 2.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVTR vs. FBNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF	0.51%	8.10%	4.03%
FBNDX Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund	0.06%	7.37%	1.83%

Correlation

The correlation between EVTR and FBNDX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2024	0.89

The correlation between EVTR and FBNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EVTR vs. FBNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVTR

EVTR Risk / Return Rank: 38
EVTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
EVTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
EVTR Omega Ratio Rank: 38
EVTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
EVTR Martin Ratio Rank: 36

FBNDX

FBNDX Risk / Return Rank: 16
FBNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
FBNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
FBNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
FBNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FBNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVTR vs. FBNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) and Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EVTR	FBNDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	1.05	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	1.57	+0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.18	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	1.41	+0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.29	3.96	+1.33

EVTR vs. FBNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the FBNDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVTR and FBNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EVTR vs. FBNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVTR drawdown since its inception was -4.08%, smaller than the maximum FBNDX drawdown of -42.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVTR and FBNDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVTR	FBNDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.08%	-42.76%	+38.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.86%	-3.02%	+0.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.09%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.74%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-18.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.22%	-1.89%	+0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.97%	-10.34%	+9.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	1.08%	-0.13%

Volatility

EVTR vs. FBNDX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) has a higher volatility of 1.24% compared to Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) at 1.18%. This indicates that EVTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVTR	FBNDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.24%	1.18%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.92%	3.01%	-0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.70%	4.09%	-0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.32%	6.03%	-1.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.32%	5.03%	-0.71%

EVTR vs. FBNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVTR has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than FBNDX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVTR vs. FBNDX - Dividend Comparison

EVTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than FBNDX's 3.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF	4.67%	4.51%	4.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FBNDX Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund	3.92%	3.87%	3.34%	3.56%	1.98%	1.34%	4.70%	2.75%	2.86%	2.18%	2.72%	2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVTR and FBNDX in my portfolio?

EVTR and FBNDX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVTR or FBNDX?

EVTR has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to FBNDX (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVTR dropped -4.08% vs FBNDX's -42.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EVTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.