FBMPX vs. ENFR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FBMPX (Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both funds - FBMPX is a Communications Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Over the past 10 years, FBMPX returned 17.13%/yr vs 12.28%/yr for ENFR. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBMPX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.

Performance

FBMPX vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBMPX achieves a 6.45% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 25.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FBMPX has outperformed ENFR with an annualized return of 17.13%, while ENFR has yielded a comparatively lower 12.28% annualized return.

FBMPX

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: -4.77%
• YTD: 6.45%
• 6M: 7.98%
• 1Y: 31.47%
• 3Y*: 32.60%
• 5Y*: 13.16%
• 10Y*: 17.13%

ENFR

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 25.97%
• 6M: 26.39%
• 1Y: 26.50%
• 3Y*: 28.39%
• 5Y*: 19.43%
• 10Y*: 12.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBMPX vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FBMPX Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio	6.45%	37.07%	35.98%	56.85%	-38.30%	15.97%	35.48%	33.14%	-3.52%	12.60%
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	25.97%	5.88%	42.17%	15.63%	17.48%	39.97%	-24.14%	21.60%	-18.67%	-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FBMPX and ENFR is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013	0.37

The correlation between FBMPX and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FBMPX vs. ENFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FBMPX	ENFR
Communication Services	83.1%	-
Technology	13.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	2.8%	-
Healthcare	0.7%	-
Industrials	0.3%	3.4%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	98.8%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	1.0%

Return for Risk

FBMPX vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBMPX

FBMPX Risk / Return Rank: 43
FBMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
FBMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
FBMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FBMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
FBMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

ENFR

ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 62
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 59
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBMPX vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBMPX	ENFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	1.82	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	2.52	-0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.31	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	3.08	-1.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.79	8.18	-1.39

FBMPX vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBMPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBMPX and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBMPX vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBMPX drawdown since its inception was -61.77%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBMPX and ENFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBMPX	ENFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.77%	-68.28%	+6.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.90%	-8.64%	-8.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.20%	-15.58%	-7.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.42%	-20.29%	-27.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.42%	-62.64%	+15.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.18%	-3.91%	-2.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.62%	-15.95%	+5.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.56%	3.25%	+1.31%

Volatility

FBMPX vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) have volatilities of 5.48% and 5.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBMPX	ENFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.48%	5.63%	-0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.31%	11.48%	+2.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.24%	14.66%	+4.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.30%	19.30%	+4.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.98%	24.67%	-2.69%

FBMPX vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBMPX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBMPX vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

FBMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.58%, more than ENFR's 3.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	3.98%	4.77%	4.41%	5.48%	5.23%	7.86%	7.57%	5.81%	3.98%	2.98%	3.31%	3.34%
FBMPX Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio	12.58%	8.09%	7.05%	0.00%	0.00%	5.88%	3.74%	35.43%	15.29%	5.53%	7.50%	7.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBMPX and ENFR in my portfolio?

FBMPX and ENFR have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBMPX or ENFR?

ENFR has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to FBMPX (5.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBMPX dropped -61.77% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.