PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBGX vs. XTJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FBGX vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FBGX vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FBGX
UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN
0.00%0.00%35.73%83.74%-56.41%24.80%
XTJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
-0.71%15.42%14.43%25.72%-15.66%7.28%

Returns By Period


FBGX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XTJL

1D
0.66%
1M
-1.72%
YTD
-0.71%
6M
1.81%
1Y
16.00%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FBGX vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FBGX vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBGX

XTJL
XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBGX vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FBGX vs. XTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBGXXTJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

Correlation

The correlation between FBGX and XTJL is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FBGX vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither FBGX nor XTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FBGX vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FBGXXTJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

Volatility

FBGX vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FBGXXTJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.46%