FBGX vs. XTJL
Compare and contrast key facts about UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL).
FBGX and XTJL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FBGX is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 11, 2014. XTJL is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Jul 1, 2021.
Performance
FBGX vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FBGX vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 35.73% | 83.74% | -56.41% | 24.80% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | -0.71% | 15.42% | 14.43% | 25.72% | -15.66% | 7.28% |
Returns By Period
FBGX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTJL
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 16.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FBGX vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FBGX vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank
FBGX
XTJL
FBGX vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBGX | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.57 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between FBGX and XTJL is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FBGX vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither FBGX nor XTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FBGX vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBGX | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -23.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -2.12% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -4.18% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.19% | — |
Volatility
FBGX vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FBGX | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 18.18% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 15.46% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 15.46% | — |