FBGX vs. NRGU

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU).

FBGX and NRGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FBGX is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 11, 2014. NRGU is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). It was launched on Apr 9, 2019. Both FBGX and NRGU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FBGX vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FBGX vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN	0.00%	0.00%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	139.49%	-33.00%

Returns By Period

FBGX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NRGU

• 1D: -10.75%
• 1M: 24.81%
• YTD: 139.49%
• 6M: 107.68%
• 1Y: 69.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBGX vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.

FBGX

UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN

NRGU

MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN

Return for Risk

FBGX vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 45
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 54
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBGX vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBGX	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.61	—

Dividends

FBGX vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither FBGX nor NRGU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FBGX	NRGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-57.50%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-55.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-17.40%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-25.38%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	27.12%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FBGX	NRGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	23.31%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	50.27%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	88.18%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	87.12%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	87.12%	—