FBGX vs. MUU
FBGX (UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FBGX is passively managed, while MUU is actively managed. FBGX charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for MUU.
Performance
FBGX vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FBGX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUU
- 1D
- 5.32%
- 1M
- 249.29%
- YTD
- 929.51%
- 6M
- 1,310.65%
- 1Y
- 6,847.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBGX vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 929.51% | 599.03% | -43.09% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBGX vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
FBGX
MUU
FBGX vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBGX | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 52.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 6.58 | — |
Drawdowns
FBGX vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBGX | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -75.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -52.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -23.50% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.51% | — |
Volatility
FBGX vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBGX | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 55.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 105.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 131.89% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 133.83% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 133.83% | — |
FBGX vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBGX vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
FBGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.47% | 4.27% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUU is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for FBGX.
MUU has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for FBGX.
They also come from different issuers: UBS and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for FBGX and 1.06% for MUU.
Find the right allocation for FBGX and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer