PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBGX vs. DLLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBGX vs. DLLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FBGX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DLLL

1D
-13.27%
1M
274.22%
YTD
816.87%
6M
673.02%
1Y
986.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBGX vs. DLLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


FBGX vs. DLLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FBGX
DLLL

Basic Materials

0.0%

-

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.0%

-

Energy

0.0%

-

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Industrials

0.0%

-

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Technology

0.0%
66.7%

Utilities

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

FBGX
0.0%
DLLL

-

Communication Services

FBGX
0.0%
DLLL

-

Consumer Cyclical

FBGX
0.0%
DLLL

-

Consumer Defensive

FBGX
0.0%
DLLL

-

Energy

FBGX
0.0%
DLLL

-

Financial Services

FBGX
0.0%
DLLL

-

Healthcare

FBGX
0.0%
DLLL

-

Industrials

FBGX
0.0%
DLLL

-

Real Estate

FBGX
0.0%
DLLL

-

Technology

FBGX
0.0%
DLLL
66.7%

Utilities

FBGX
0.0%
DLLL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBGX vs. DLLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBGX

DLLL
DLLL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
DLLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLLL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DLLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLLL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBGX vs. DLLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FBGX vs. DLLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBGXDLLLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.38

Drawdowns

FBGX vs. DLLL - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBGXDLLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.33%

Volatility

FBGX vs. DLLL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBGXDLLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

68.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

129.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

130.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

130.59%

FBGX vs. DLLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DLLL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBGX vs. DLLL - Dividend Comparison

Neither FBGX nor DLLL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, FBGX is cheaper at 1.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FBGX is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.

FBGX and DLLL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

FBGX tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%), while DLLL tracks Dell Technologies Inc. (DELL). They also come from different issuers: UBS and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for FBGX and 1.50% for DLLL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBGX and DLLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer