FBGX vs. AMTR
FBGX (UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN) and AMTR (ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - FBGX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%), while AMTR is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBGX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AMTR.
Performance
FBGX vs. AMTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FBGX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMTR
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBGX vs. AMTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN | 35.73% | 83.74% | -56.41% | 57.04% | 16.94% |
AMTR ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN | 44.68% | 12.75% | 20.41% | 36.99% | 15.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBGX and AMTR is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2020 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FBGX and AMTR has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FBGX vs. AMTR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FBGX
AMTR
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Real Estate
Technology
Utilities
Basic Materials
FBGX
AMTR
Communication Services
FBGX
AMTR
Consumer Cyclical
FBGX
AMTR
Consumer Defensive
FBGX
AMTR
Energy
FBGX
AMTR
Financial Services
FBGX
AMTR
Healthcare
FBGX
AMTR
Industrials
FBGX
AMTR
Real Estate
FBGX
AMTR
Technology
FBGX
AMTR
Utilities
FBGX
AMTR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBGX vs. AMTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBGX vs. AMTR - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility
FBGX vs. AMTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
FBGX vs. AMTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than AMTR's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBGX vs. AMTR - Dividend Comparison
Neither FBGX nor AMTR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FBGX and AMTR have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMTR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMTR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for FBGX.
FBGX and AMTR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
FBGX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AMTR is MLPs. FBGX tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%), while AMTR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for FBGX and 0.75% for AMTR.
Find the right allocation for FBGX and AMTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer