PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBFZX vs. BLNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBFZX vs. BLNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Managed Income Fund (FBFZX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBFZX achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly lower than BLNDX's 12.91% return.


FBFZX

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
5.76%
6M
5.65%
1Y
13.65%
3Y*
8.35%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*
7.55%

BLNDX

1D
0.48%
1M
-3.47%
YTD
12.91%
6M
12.69%
1Y
30.93%
3Y*
10.21%
5Y*
9.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBFZX vs. BLNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FBFZX
Franklin Managed Income Fund
5.76%9.23%5.14%7.90%-6.96%15.46%5.60%0.08%
BLNDX
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional
12.91%4.12%13.11%5.79%3.71%20.16%16.30%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FBFZX and BLNDX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019

0.48

The correlation between FBFZX and BLNDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (3 years) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBFZX vs. BLNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBFZX
FBFZX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FBFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FBFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

BLNDX
BLNDX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BLNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BLNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBFZX vs. BLNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Managed Income Fund (FBFZX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBFZXBLNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.42

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

5.89

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.23

18.90

-5.67

FBFZX vs. BLNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBFZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the BLNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBFZX and BLNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBFZX vs. BLNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBFZX drawdown since its inception was -49.53%, which is greater than BLNDX's maximum drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBFZX and BLNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBFZXBLNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.53%

-17.69%

-31.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.85%

-5.19%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.28%

-17.69%

+9.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.44%

-17.69%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-4.73%

+3.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.81%

-3.19%

-3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

1.61%

-0.57%

Volatility

FBFZX vs. BLNDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Managed Income Fund (FBFZX) is 1.81%, while Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that FBFZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBFZXBLNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.81%

3.59%

-1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.04%

9.91%

-5.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.32%

12.74%

-7.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.92%

11.71%

-3.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.82%

11.77%

-2.95%

FBFZX vs. BLNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBFZX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BLNDX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBFZX vs. BLNDX - Dividend Comparison

FBFZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than BLNDX's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLNDX
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional
0.65%0.73%5.74%3.71%2.67%6.11%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FBFZX
Franklin Managed Income Fund
4.26%3.61%6.01%4.69%4.49%7.28%4.66%11.18%4.64%4.77%4.70%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBFZX and BLNDX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLNDX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to FBFZX (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBFZX dropped -49.53% vs BLNDX's -17.69%.

FBFZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBFZX and BLNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer