FBDC vs. FDL
FBDC (FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FBDC is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. FBDC is actively managed, while FDL is passively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBDC charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDL.
Performance
FBDC vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBDC achieves a -9.51% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 13.33% return.
FBDC
- 1D
- -2.98%
- 1M
- -7.81%
- YTD
- -9.51%
- 6M
- -10.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDL
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 13.33%
- 6M
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 23.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
FBDC vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | -9.51% | -2.43% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 13.33% | 8.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBDC and FDL is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBDC vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
FBDC
FDL
FBDC vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBDC | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.70 | 0.45 | -1.15 |
Drawdowns
FBDC vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBDC drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBDC and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBDC | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.60% | -65.93% | +45.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.24% | -2.18% | -15.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.14% | -9.66% | -0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.75% | — |
Volatility
FBDC vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBDC | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.06% | 11.28% | +6.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.06% | 14.31% | +3.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.06% | 17.11% | +0.95% |
FBDC vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBDC has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBDC vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
FBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.52%, more than FDL's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | 11.52% | 5.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.68% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBDC and FDL have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.
FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.52%, compared with 3.68% for FDL.
FBDC is categorized as Financials Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for FBDC and 0.45% for FDL.
Find the right allocation for FBDC and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer