PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBDC vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBDC vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBDC achieves a -9.51% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 13.33% return.


FBDC

1D
-2.98%
1M
-7.81%
YTD
-9.51%
6M
-10.31%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FDL

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
13.33%
6M
14.76%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBDC vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FBDC and FDL is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBDC vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBDC

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBDC vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FBDC vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBDCFDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.70

0.45

-1.15

Drawdowns

FBDC vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBDC drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBDC and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBDCFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.60%

-65.93%

+45.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.24%

-2.18%

-15.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.14%

-9.66%

-0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

Volatility

FBDC vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBDCFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.06%

11.28%

+6.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.06%

14.31%

+3.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.06%

17.11%

+0.95%

FBDC vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBDC has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBDC vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

FBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.52%, more than FDL's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBDC
FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF
11.52%5.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.68%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBDC and FDL have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.

FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.52%, compared with 3.68% for FDL.

FBDC is categorized as Financials Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for FBDC and 0.45% for FDL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBDC and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer