FBDC vs. FDL
FBDC (FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FBDC is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. FBDC is actively managed, while FDL is passively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBDC charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FDL.
Performance
FBDC vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBDC achieves a -10.39% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 12.67% return.
FBDC
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- YTD
- -10.39%
- 6M
- -8.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDL
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- YTD
- 12.67%
- 6M
- 13.02%
- 1Y
- 22.39%
- 3Y*
- 19.10%
- 5Y*
- 13.08%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
FBDC vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | -10.39% | -2.66% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 12.67% | 8.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBDC and FDL is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBDC vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
FBDC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDL
FBDC vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBDC | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.26 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.40 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBDC vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBDC drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBDC and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBDC | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.60% | -65.93% | +45.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.04% | -3.09% | -14.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.44% | -9.64% | -0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.81% | — |
Volatility
FBDC vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBDC | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.00% | 11.54% | +6.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 14.31% | +3.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 17.11% | +0.89% |
FBDC vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBDC has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBDC vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
FBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.63%, more than FDL's 3.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | 11.63% | 5.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.70% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBDC and FDL have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.
FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.63%, compared with 3.70% for FDL.
FBDC is categorized as Financials Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for FBDC and 0.43% for FDL.
Find the right allocation for FBDC and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer