FBAPX vs. BRW
FBAPX (Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund) and BRW (Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, FBAPX returned 4.39%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for BRW. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FBAPX charges 0.66%/yr vs 1.71%/yr for BRW.
Performance
FBAPX vs. BRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBAPX achieves a -0.14% return, which is significantly lower than BRW's 3.83% return.
FBAPX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- 6M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- 2.33%
- 3Y*
- 4.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.12%
BRW
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 1Y
- -8.12%
- 3Y*
- 8.66%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.27M | $1.36M | $1.44M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FBAPX vs. BRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBAPX Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund | -0.14% | 7.77% | 1.57% | 6.73% | -9.94% |
BRW Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund | 3.83% | 5.89% | 12.16% | 18.49% | -4.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBAPX and BRW is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2022 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBAPX vs. BRW — Risk / Return Rank
FBAPX
BRW
FBAPX vs. BRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund (FBAPX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBAPX | BRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.91 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | -0.46 | +1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.31 | -0.76 | +3.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBAPX vs. BRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBAPX drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, smaller than the maximum BRW drawdown of -17.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBAPX and BRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBAPX | BRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.34% | -17.74% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | -17.74% | +14.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.90% | -17.74% | +12.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.11% | -8.51% | +6.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -4.11% | -0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 10.63% | -9.57% |
Volatility
FBAPX vs. BRW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund (FBAPX) is 1.04%, while Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that FBAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBAPX | BRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.04% | 3.79% | -2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.98% | 8.86% | -5.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.77% | 13.66% | -9.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.62% | 13.02% | -7.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.62% | 12.89% | -7.27% |
FBAPX vs. BRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBAPX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than BRW's 1.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBAPX vs. BRW - Dividend Comparison
FBAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, less than BRW's 15.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRW Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund | 15.30% | 14.46% | 12.27% | 16.02% | 13.82% | 4.53% |
FBAPX Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund | 4.44% | 4.61% | 4.81% | 4.08% | 3.19% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBAPX and BRW have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRW has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to FBAPX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBAPX dropped -14.34% vs BRW's -17.74%.
FBAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBAPX and BRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer