PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBAPX vs. BRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBAPX vs. BRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund (FBAPX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBAPX achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than BRW's 1.14% return.


FBAPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.74%
YTD
0.75%
6M
0.88%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
4.48%
5Y*
10Y*

BRW

1D
1.39%
1M
-1.43%
YTD
1.14%
6M
2.01%
1Y
-3.62%
3Y*
9.44%
5Y*
6.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBAPX vs. BRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FBAPX
Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund
0.75%7.77%1.57%6.73%-9.94%
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
1.14%5.89%12.16%18.49%-4.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FBAPX and BRW is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2022

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBAPX vs. BRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBAPX
FBAPX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FBAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FBAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

BRW
BRW Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRW Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRW Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBAPX vs. BRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund (FBAPX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBAPXBRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.96

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

-0.21

+2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.36

-0.36

+5.72

FBAPX vs. BRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the BRW Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBAPX and BRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBAPX vs. BRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBAPX drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, smaller than the maximum BRW drawdown of -17.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBAPX and BRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBAPXBRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.34%

-17.74%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

-17.74%

+14.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.04%

-17.74%

+11.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-10.88%

+9.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.91%

-4.00%

-0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

10.19%

-9.23%

Volatility

FBAPX vs. BRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund (FBAPX) is 1.11%, while Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that FBAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBAPXBRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

4.44%

-3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.87%

8.23%

-5.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92%

13.40%

-9.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.66%

12.94%

-7.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.66%

12.90%

-7.24%

FBAPX vs. BRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBAPX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than BRW's 1.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBAPX vs. BRW - Dividend Comparison

FBAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, less than BRW's 15.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
15.49%14.46%12.27%16.02%13.82%4.53%
FBAPX
Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund
4.72%4.61%4.81%4.08%3.19%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBAPX and BRW have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRW has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to FBAPX (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBAPX dropped -14.34% vs BRW's -17.74%.

FBAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBAPX and BRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer