PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBAPX vs. BRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBAPX vs. BRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund (FBAPX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBAPX achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than BRW's 4.77% return.


FBAPX

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.43%
6M
0.09%
YTD
0.54%
1Y
5.06%
3Y*
4.29%
5Y*
10Y*

BRW

1D
0.30%
1M
3.91%
6M
4.38%
YTD
4.77%
1Y
-3.04%
3Y*
10.24%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBAPX vs. BRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FBAPX
Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund
0.54%7.77%1.57%6.73%-9.94%
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
4.77%5.89%12.16%18.49%-4.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FBAPX and BRW is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2022

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBAPX vs. BRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBAPX
FBAPX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FBAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FBAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

BRW
BRW Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRW Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRW Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBAPX vs. BRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund (FBAPX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBAPXBRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

0.97

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

-0.17

+1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.87

-0.29

+5.16

FBAPX vs. BRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the BRW Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBAPX and BRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBAPX vs. BRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBAPX drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, smaller than the maximum BRW drawdown of -17.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBAPX and BRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBAPXBRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.34%

-17.74%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

-17.74%

+14.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.04%

-17.74%

+11.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-7.68%

+6.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.86%

-4.06%

-0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

10.43%

-9.46%

Volatility

FBAPX vs. BRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund (FBAPX) is 1.08%, while Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that FBAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBAPXBRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

3.28%

-2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.98%

8.40%

-5.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85%

13.44%

-9.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.64%

12.98%

-7.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.64%

12.87%

-7.23%

FBAPX vs. BRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBAPX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than BRW's 1.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBAPX vs. BRW - Dividend Comparison

FBAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, less than BRW's 15.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
15.16%14.46%12.27%16.02%13.82%4.53%
FBAPX
Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund
4.78%4.61%4.81%4.08%3.19%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBAPX and BRW have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRW has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to FBAPX (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBAPX dropped -14.34% vs BRW's -17.74%.

FBAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBAPX and BRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer