PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRW vs. SABA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRW vs. SABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II (SABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRW achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly lower than SABA's 3.27% return.


BRW

1D
-0.46%
1M
-2.93%
YTD
-0.40%
6M
-0.11%
1Y
-4.49%
3Y*
8.88%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*

SABA

1D
-0.37%
1M
-2.18%
YTD
3.27%
6M
1.80%
1Y
-0.76%
3Y*
9.25%
5Y*
3.08%
10Y*
2.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRW vs. SABA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
-0.40%5.89%12.16%18.49%-4.64%3.19%
SABA
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II
3.27%-0.31%31.32%-2.77%-9.02%0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between BRW and SABA is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRW vs. SABA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRW
BRW Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRW Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRW Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

SABA
SABA Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SABA Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
SABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
SABA Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRW vs. SABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II (SABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRWSABADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.00

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.25

-0.07

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.44

-0.14

-0.30

BRW vs. SABA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRW Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the SABA Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRW and SABA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRW vs. SABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRW drawdown since its inception was -17.74%, smaller than the maximum SABA drawdown of -32.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRW and SABA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRWSABADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.74%

-32.37%

+14.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.74%

-10.45%

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.74%

-14.96%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.74%

-19.76%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.24%

-5.65%

-6.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-7.56%

+3.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.14%

5.41%

+4.73%

Volatility

BRW vs. SABA - Volatility Comparison

Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II (SABA) at 3.25%. This indicates that BRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRWSABADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

3.25%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.18%

8.25%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.36%

11.71%

+1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.93%

14.58%

-1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.90%

16.66%

-3.76%

Dividends

BRW vs. SABA - Dividend Comparison

BRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.73%, more than SABA's 9.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
15.73%14.46%12.27%16.02%13.82%4.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SABA
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II
9.74%9.65%8.32%11.43%9.14%7.19%4.00%6.68%5.81%4.44%4.63%4.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRW and SABA have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRW has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to SABA (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRW dropped -17.74% vs SABA's -32.37%.

SABA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.07 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRW and SABA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer