FBAPX vs. CFRIX
FBAPX (Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund) and CFRIX (Catalyst/CIFC Floating Rate Income Fund) are both mutual funds - FBAPX is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by Fidelity, while CFRIX is a Bank Loan fund managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. Over the past 3 years, FBAPX returned 4.48%/yr vs 7.02%/yr for CFRIX. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBAPX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for CFRIX.
Performance
FBAPX vs. CFRIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBAPX achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly higher than CFRIX's 0.49% return.
FBAPX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 5.15%
- 3Y*
- 4.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CFRIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 4.78%
- 3Y*
- 7.02%
- 5Y*
- 4.63%
- 10Y*
- 5.34%
FBAPX vs. CFRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBAPX Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund | 0.75% | 7.77% | 1.57% | 6.73% | -9.94% |
CFRIX Catalyst/CIFC Floating Rate Income Fund | 0.49% | 6.28% | 7.98% | 11.65% | -3.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBAPX and CFRIX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2022 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBAPX vs. CFRIX — Risk / Return Rank
FBAPX
CFRIX
FBAPX vs. CFRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund (FBAPX) and Catalyst/CIFC Floating Rate Income Fund (CFRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBAPX | CFRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.61 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 2.19 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.50 | 7.70 | -2.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBAPX vs. CFRIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBAPX drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, smaller than the maximum CFRIX drawdown of -19.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBAPX and CFRIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBAPX | CFRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.34% | -19.18% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | -2.19% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.04% | -2.55% | -3.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -6.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -0.44% | -0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.91% | -1.23% | -3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 0.62% | +0.34% |
Volatility
FBAPX vs. CFRIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund (FBAPX) has a higher volatility of 1.11% compared to Catalyst/CIFC Floating Rate Income Fund (CFRIX) at 0.66%. This indicates that FBAPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CFRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBAPX | CFRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 0.66% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.87% | 1.91% | +0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.92% | 2.51% | +1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.66% | 2.71% | +2.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.66% | 3.80% | +1.86% |
FBAPX vs. CFRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBAPX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than CFRIX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBAPX vs. CFRIX - Dividend Comparison
FBAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, less than CFRIX's 6.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFRIX Catalyst/CIFC Floating Rate Income Fund | 6.73% | 6.83% | 7.32% | 7.13% | 3.79% | 2.44% | 4.06% | 5.50% | 4.26% | 4.50% | 5.69% | 6.27% |
FBAPX Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund | 4.72% | 4.61% | 4.81% | 4.08% | 3.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBAPX and CFRIX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBAPX has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to CFRIX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBAPX dropped -14.34% vs CFRIX's -19.18%.
CFRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBAPX and CFRIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer