FBAPX vs. MZLSX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund (FBAPX) and Muzinich Low Duration Fund (MZLSX).

FBAPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 9, 2022. MZLSX is managed by Muzinich. It was launched on Jun 29, 2016.

Performance

FBAPX vs. MZLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund (FBAPX) and Muzinich Low Duration Fund (MZLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FBAPX vs. MZLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FBAPX Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund	-0.36%	7.77%	1.57%	6.73%	-9.94%
MZLSX Muzinich Low Duration Fund	-0.57%	6.38%	6.30%	7.63%	-1.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBAPX achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly higher than MZLSX's -0.57% return.

FBAPX

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: -2.32%
• YTD: -0.36%
• 6M: 0.38%
• 1Y: 4.49%
• 3Y*: 3.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MZLSX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -1.38%
• YTD: -0.57%
• 6M: 0.72%
• 1Y: 4.41%
• 3Y*: 6.11%
• 5Y*: 3.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBAPX vs. MZLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBAPX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than MZLSX's 0.50% expense ratio.

FBAPX

Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund

MZLSX

Muzinich Low Duration Fund

Return for Risk

FBAPX vs. MZLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBAPX

FBAPX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FBAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FBAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FBAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FBAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FBAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

MZLSX

MZLSX Risk / Return Rank: 96
MZLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
MZLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MZLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MZLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
MZLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBAPX vs. MZLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund (FBAPX) and Muzinich Low Duration Fund (MZLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBAPX	MZLSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	2.80	-1.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	4.00	-2.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.71	-0.50
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	2.99	-0.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.46	14.39	-7.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FBAPX vs. MZLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the MZLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBAPX and MZLSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBAPX	MZLSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	2.80	-1.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	2.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	1.69	-1.48

Correlation

The correlation between FBAPX and MZLSX is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FBAPX vs. MZLSX - Dividend Comparison

FBAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than MZLSX's 7.01% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FBAPX Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund	4.32%	4.61%	4.81%	4.08%	3.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MZLSX Muzinich Low Duration Fund	7.01%	7.03%	4.77%	4.88%	3.85%	6.36%	2.08%	2.24%	8.62%	1.86%	0.79%

Drawdowns

FBAPX vs. MZLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBAPX drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, which is greater than MZLSX's maximum drawdown of -12.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBAPX and MZLSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBAPX	MZLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.34%	-12.66%	-1.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.77%	-1.50%	-1.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-6.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.32%	-1.40%	-0.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.11%	-0.86%	-4.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	0.31%	+0.57%

Volatility

FBAPX vs. MZLSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Tactical Bond Fund (FBAPX) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to Muzinich Low Duration Fund (MZLSX) at 0.81%. This indicates that FBAPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MZLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBAPX	MZLSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.51%	0.81%	+0.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.57%	1.13%	+1.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.31%	1.57%	+2.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.73%	1.58%	+4.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.73%	2.13%	+3.60%