PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FB vs. QB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FB vs. QB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (FB) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FB achieves a 6.03% return, which is significantly lower than QB's 10.47% return.


FB

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.90%
YTD
6.03%
6M
6.64%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QB

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.95%
YTD
10.47%
6M
9.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FB vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FB and QB is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.81

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FB vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (FB) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FB vs. QB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBQBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.04

3.17

-0.13

Drawdowns

FB vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FB drawdown since its inception was -1.38%, smaller than the maximum QB drawdown of -1.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FB and QB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBQBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.38%

-1.83%

+0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.30%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.30%

-0.34%

+0.04%

Volatility

FB vs. QB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBQBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.67%

5.75%

-1.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.67%

5.75%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.67%

5.75%

-1.08%

FB vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FB and QB have an expense ratio of 0.58%.


Dividends

FB vs. QB - Dividend Comparison

FB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than QB's 0.62% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


FB and QB have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.58% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FB and QB have the same expense ratio: 0.58% per year.

FB has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.62% for QB.

FB tracks S&P 500, while QB tracks Nasdaq-100.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FB and QB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer