FB vs. QB
FB (ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) and QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from ProShares - FB tracks the S&P 500 while QB tracks the Nasdaq-100. Both are passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.58% expense ratio.
Performance
FB vs. QB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FB achieves a 5.68% return, which is significantly lower than QB's 9.56% return.
FB
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 5.68%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QB
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 9.56%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FB vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FB ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 5.68% | 6.10% |
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 9.56% | 6.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between FB and QB is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FB vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (FB) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FB vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FB drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum QB drawdown of -3.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FB and QB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FB | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -3.47% | +1.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -1.51% | +1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.33% | -0.41% | +0.08% |
Volatility
FB vs. QB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FB | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.02% | 6.85% | -1.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.02% | 6.85% | -1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.02% | 6.85% | -1.83% |
FB vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FB and QB have an expense ratio of 0.58%.
Dividends
FB vs. QB - Dividend Comparison
FB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than QB's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FB ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 1.24% | 0.92% |
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 0.63% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FB and QB have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.58% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FB and QB have the same expense ratio: 0.58% per year.
FB has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.63% for QB.
FB tracks S&P 500, while QB tracks Nasdaq-100.
Find the right allocation for FB and QB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer