FB vs. QB
FB (ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) and QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from ProShares - FB tracks the S&P 500 while QB tracks the Nasdaq-100. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.58% expense ratio.
Performance
FB vs. QB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FB achieves a 6.03% return, which is significantly lower than QB's 10.47% return.
FB
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 6.03%
- 6M
- 6.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QB
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 10.47%
- 6M
- 9.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FB vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FB ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 6.03% | 6.72% |
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 10.47% | 5.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between FB and QB is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FB vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (FB) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FB | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.04 | 3.17 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
FB vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FB drawdown since its inception was -1.38%, smaller than the maximum QB drawdown of -1.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FB and QB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FB | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.38% | -1.83% | +0.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.30% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.30% | -0.34% | +0.04% |
Volatility
FB vs. QB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FB | QB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.67% | 5.75% | -1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.67% | 5.75% | -1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.67% | 5.75% | -1.08% |
FB vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FB and QB have an expense ratio of 0.58%.
Dividends
FB vs. QB - Dividend Comparison
FB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than QB's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FB ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 1.23% | 0.92% |
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 0.62% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FB and QB have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.58% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FB and QB have the same expense ratio: 0.58% per year.
FB has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.62% for QB.
FB tracks S&P 500, while QB tracks Nasdaq-100.
Find the right allocation for FB and QB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer