PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FB vs. UVXY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FB vs. UVXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (FB) and ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FB achieves a 7.10% return, which is significantly higher than UVXY's -32.31% return.


FB

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.49%
6M
6.09%
YTD
7.10%
1Y
12.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UVXY

1D
4.92%
1M
-15.35%
6M
-29.18%
YTD
-32.31%
1Y
-71.44%
3Y*
-61.73%
5Y*
-67.56%
10Y*
-72.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FB vs. UVXY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FB and UVXY is -0.59, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

-0.57

The correlation between FB and UVXY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.59 to -0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FB vs. UVXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FB
FB Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FB Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FB Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

UVXY
UVXY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
UVXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UVXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
UVXY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
UVXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
UVXY Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FB vs. UVXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (FB) and ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBUVXYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

0.83

+0.74

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.28

-0.98

+8.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.31

-1.46

+27.77

FB vs. UVXY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FB Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the UVXY Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FB and UVXY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FB vs. UVXY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FB drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum UVXY drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FB and UVXY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBUVXYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-100.00%

+98.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.76%

-73.42%

+71.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-100.00%

+99.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.32%

-98.75%

+98.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.49%

48.91%

-48.42%

Volatility

FB vs. UVXY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (FB) is 1.84%, while ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY) has a volatility of 21.23%. This indicates that FB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UVXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBUVXYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.84%

21.23%

-19.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.76%

66.69%

-62.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.97%

85.49%

-80.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.07%

103.84%

-98.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.07%

112.03%

-106.96%

FB vs. UVXY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than UVXY's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

FB vs. UVXY - Dividend Comparison

FB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, while UVXY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


FB and UVXY have a correlation of -0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UVXY has higher volatility (21.23%) compared to FB (1.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FB dropped -1.76% vs UVXY's -100.00%.

On 1-year performance, FB leads with 12.75% vs -71.44% for UVXY. On fees, FB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, FB has been the lower-risk option at 1.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FB has performed better with a 12.75% return vs -71.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UVXY.

FB has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 0.00% for UVXY.

FB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while UVXY is Volatility. FB tracks S&P 500, while UVXY tracks S&P 500 VIX SHORT-TERM FUTURES TR (150%). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for FB and 0.95% for UVXY.

FB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FB and UVXY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer