PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FB vs. UVXY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FB vs. UVXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (FB) and ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FB achieves a 6.83% return, which is significantly higher than UVXY's -35.24% return.


FB

1D
0.26%
1M
0.45%
6M
6.69%
YTD
6.83%
1Y
13.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.13%

UVXY

1D
-4.24%
1M
-6.17%
6M
-37.50%
YTD
-35.24%
1Y
-73.24%
3Y*
-61.42%
5Y*
-68.18%
10Y*
-71.50%
ALL TIME*
-80.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$129.95K$99.51K$106.59K
$190.03M$191.90M$239.87M

FB vs. UVXY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FB and UVXY is -0.62, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

-0.57

The correlation between FB and UVXY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.62 to -0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FB vs. UVXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FB
FB Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FB Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FB Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

UVXY
UVXY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
UVXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UVXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
UVXY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
UVXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
UVXY Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FB vs. UVXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (FB) and ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBUVXYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

0.85

+0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.95

-0.95

+7.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.49

-1.35

+25.85

FB vs. UVXY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FB Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the UVXY Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FB and UVXY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FB vs. UVXY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FB drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum UVXY drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FB and UVXY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBUVXYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-100.00%

+98.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.76%

-73.88%

+72.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-100.00%

+99.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.33%

-98.76%

+98.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

51.60%

-51.10%

Volatility

FB vs. UVXY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (FB) is 1.15%, while ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY) has a volatility of 22.30%. This indicates that FB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UVXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBUVXYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

22.30%

-21.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.64%

65.55%

-61.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.03%

87.28%

-82.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.02%

103.39%

-98.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.02%

112.09%

-107.07%

FB vs. UVXY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than UVXY's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

FB vs. UVXY - Dividend Comparison

FB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, while UVXY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


FB and UVXY have a correlation of -0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UVXY has higher volatility (22.30%) compared to FB (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FB dropped -1.76% vs UVXY's -100.00%.

On 1-year performance, FB leads with 13.01% vs -73.24% for UVXY. On fees, FB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, FB has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FB has performed better with a 13.01% return vs -73.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UVXY.

FB has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.00% for UVXY.

FB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while UVXY is Volatility. FB tracks S&P 500, while UVXY tracks S&P 500 VIX SHORT-TERM FUTURES TR (150%). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for FB and 0.95% for UVXY.

FB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FB and UVXY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer