FAUG vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

FAUG (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FAUG is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index August, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. FAUG is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, FAUG returned 15.11% vs 264.10% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.44, they often move in opposite directions. FAUG charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

FAUG vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAUG achieves a 7.31% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -26.97% return.

FAUG

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 1.46%
• 6M: 6.29%
• YTD: 7.31%
• 1Y: 15.11%
• 3Y*: 13.87%
• 5Y*: 8.97%
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: 39.32%
• 6M: -19.19%
• YTD: -26.97%
• 1Y: 264.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAUG vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FAUG FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August	7.31%	13.77%	3.12%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-26.97%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FAUG and MSTZ is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.44

Return for Risk

FAUG vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAUG

FAUG Risk / Return Rank: 83
FAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 87

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 60
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 63
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAUG vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAUG	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	1.64	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.03	2.34	+0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.30	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	2.86	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.33	5.59	+8.75

FAUG vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAUG and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FAUG vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAUG drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAUG and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAUG	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.33%	-99.38%	+77.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.26%	-84.89%	+79.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-97.51%	+97.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.80%	-94.53%	+91.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.04%	43.41%	-42.37%

Volatility

FAUG vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) is 1.69%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.46%. This indicates that FAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAUG	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.69%	56.46%	-54.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.58%	135.20%	-129.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.06%	148.41%	-141.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.79%	171.17%	-160.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.67%	171.17%	-158.50%

FAUG vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAUG vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither FAUG nor MSTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAUG and MSTZ in my portfolio?

FAUG and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAUG or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.46%) compared to FAUG (1.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAUG dropped -22.33% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, FAUG or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 264.10% vs 15.11% for FAUG. On fees, FAUG is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, FAUG has been the lower-risk option at 1.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FAUG or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 264.10% return vs 15.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FAUG or MSTZ?

FAUG is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FAUG or MSTZ?

FAUG and MSTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FAUG and MSTZ?

FAUG is categorized as Defined Outcome, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FAUG and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.