PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAUG vs. VOTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FAUG vs. VOTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) and Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FAUG vs. VOTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FAUG
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August
-2.20%13.77%14.55%17.24%-10.52%5.20%
VOTE
Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF
-4.68%17.95%25.23%27.60%-19.74%12.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAUG achieves a -2.20% return, which is significantly higher than VOTE's -4.68% return.


FAUG

1D
1.87%
1M
-2.96%
YTD
-2.20%
6M
-0.24%
1Y
13.84%
3Y*
12.39%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*

VOTE

1D
2.86%
1M
-4.95%
YTD
-4.68%
6M
-2.30%
1Y
17.91%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FAUG vs. VOTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VOTE's 0.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FAUG vs. VOTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAUG
FAUG Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

VOTE
VOTE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VOTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOTE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VOTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAUG vs. VOTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) and Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAUGVOTEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.14

0.97

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.69

1.49

+0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.23

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

1.52

+0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.80

7.13

+1.67

FAUG vs. VOTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the VOTE Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAUG and VOTE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAUGVOTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

0.97

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.61

+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between FAUG and VOTE is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FAUG vs. VOTE - Dividend Comparison

FAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.


TTM20252024202320222021
FAUG
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOTE
Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF
1.04%1.03%1.18%1.33%1.54%0.54%

Drawdowns

FAUG vs. VOTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAUG drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, smaller than the maximum VOTE drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAUG and VOTE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FAUGVOTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.33%

-25.71%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-12.07%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.48%

-6.51%

+3.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.90%

-6.34%

+3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

2.57%

-0.95%

Volatility

FAUG vs. VOTE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) is 3.66%, while Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) has a volatility of 5.35%. This indicates that FAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FAUGVOTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

5.35%

-1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.82%

9.71%

-3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.24%

18.49%

-6.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.74%

17.31%

-6.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.88%

17.31%

-4.43%