PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FATN vs. NVGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FATN vs. NVGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FatPipe, Inc (FATN) and Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FATN achieves a 164.85% return, which is significantly higher than NVGS's 20.16% return.


FATN

1D
-0.19%
1M
-11.57%
6M
152.36%
YTD
164.85%
1Y
-38.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVGS

1D
2.68%
1M
-10.13%
6M
15.94%
YTD
20.16%
1Y
35.03%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
15.88%
10Y*
6.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FATN vs. NVGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FATN
FatPipe, Inc
164.85%-68.92%
NVGS
Navigator Holdings Ltd.
20.16%47.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FATN and NVGS is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2025

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FATN:

$75.04M

NVGS:

$1.28B

EPS

FATN:

$0.08

NVGS:

$1.64

PE Ratio

FATN:

68.09

NVGS:

12.58

PEG Ratio

FATN:

0.43

NVGS:

0.01

PS Ratio

FATN:

4.92

NVGS:

2.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

FATN:

$15.13M

NVGS:

$576.17M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FATN:

$13.71M

NVGS:

$206.98M

EBITDA (TTM)

FATN:

$2.19M

NVGS:

$287.24M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FATN vs. NVGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FATN
FATN Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FATN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FATN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FATN Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FATN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FATN Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

NVGS
NVGS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NVGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVGS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
NVGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVGS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FATN vs. NVGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FatPipe, Inc (FATN) and Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FATNNVGSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.23

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

1.61

-2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.72

5.65

-6.37

FATN vs. NVGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FATN Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the NVGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FATN and NVGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FATN vs. NVGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FATN drawdown since its inception was -88.85%, roughly equal to the maximum NVGS drawdown of -87.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FATN and NVGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FATNNVGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.85%

-87.68%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-83.69%

-23.12%

-60.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.85%

-31.69%

-27.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.73%

-43.96%

-16.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

60.18%

6.58%

+53.60%

Volatility

FATN vs. NVGS - Volatility Comparison

FatPipe, Inc (FATN) has a higher volatility of 23.13% compared to Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS) at 12.05%. This indicates that FATN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FATNNVGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.13%

12.05%

+11.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

114.25%

24.48%

+89.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

149.13%

29.28%

+119.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

180.96%

35.88%

+145.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

180.96%

47.62%

+133.34%

Dividends

FATN vs. NVGS - Dividend Comparison

FATN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.


PositionTTM202520242023
FATN
FatPipe, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVGS
Navigator Holdings Ltd.
1.26%1.27%1.30%0.69%

Financials

FATN vs. NVGS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FatPipe, Inc and Navigator Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00MOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
4.09M
140.62M
(FATN) Total Revenue
(NVGS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FATN vs. NVGS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FatPipe, Inc and Navigator Holdings Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
87.7%
29.6%
Portfolio components
FATN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, FatPipe, Inc reported a gross profit of 3.58M and revenue of 4.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.7%.

NVGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Navigator Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 41.66M and revenue of 140.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.6%.

FATN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, FatPipe, Inc reported an operating income of 402.42K and revenue of 4.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.

NVGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Navigator Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 31.41M and revenue of 140.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.3%.

FATN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, FatPipe, Inc reported a net income of 310.66K and revenue of 4.09M, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.

NVGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Navigator Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 35.46M and revenue of 140.62M, resulting in a net margin of 25.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FATN and NVGS have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FATN has higher volatility (23.13%) compared to NVGS (12.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FATN dropped -88.85% vs NVGS's -87.68%.

NVGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FATN and NVGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer