FATN vs. NVGS
FATN (FatPipe, Inc) and NVGS (Navigator Holdings Ltd.) are both stocks. FATN operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while NVGS operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past year, FATN returned 3.58% vs 46.48% for NVGS. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FATN vs. NVGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FATN achieves a 200.99% return, which is significantly higher than NVGS's 29.92% return.
FATN
- 1D
- 18.75%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 241.57%
- YTD
- 200.99%
- 1Y
- 3.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -4.97%
NVGS
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 16.89%
- 6M
- 21.44%
- YTD
- 29.92%
- 1Y
- 46.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 19.37%
- 10Y*
- 9.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FATN FatPipe, Inc | $555.65K | $467.45K | $1.86M |
| $9.01M | $9.21M | $10.28M |
FATN vs. NVGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FATN FatPipe, Inc | 200.99% | -68.92% |
NVGS Navigator Holdings Ltd. | 29.92% | 47.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between FATN and NVGS is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2025 | 0.09 |
Fundamentals
FATN:
$85.27M
NVGS:
$1.38B
FATN:
$0.39
NVGS:
$1.64
FATN:
15.59
NVGS:
13.60
FATN:
0.10
NVGS:
0.01
FATN:
4.19
NVGS:
2.56
FATN:
3.23
NVGS:
1.23
FATN:
$20.30M
NVGS:
$576.17M
FATN:
$17.68M
NVGS:
$206.98M
FATN:
$4.11M
NVGS:
$287.24M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FATN vs. NVGS — Risk / Return Rank
FATN
NVGS
FATN vs. NVGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FatPipe, Inc (FATN) and Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FATN | NVGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.27 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | 1.90 | -1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | 6.23 | -6.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FATN vs. NVGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FATN drawdown since its inception was -88.85%, roughly equal to the maximum NVGS drawdown of -87.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FATN and NVGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FATN | NVGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.85% | -87.68% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -83.69% | -23.12% | -60.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.23% | -26.14% | -27.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.81% | -43.92% | -16.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 58.83% | 7.04% | +51.79% |
Volatility
FATN vs. NVGS - Volatility Comparison
FatPipe, Inc (FATN) has a higher volatility of 31.02% compared to Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS) at 8.63%. This indicates that FATN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FATN | NVGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.02% | 8.63% | +22.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 115.72% | 24.58% | +91.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 150.70% | 29.11% | +121.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 178.32% | 35.64% | +142.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 178.32% | 47.58% | +130.74% |
Dividends
FATN vs. NVGS - Dividend Comparison
FATN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FATN FatPipe, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVGS Navigator Holdings Ltd. | 1.16% | 1.27% | 1.30% | 0.69% |
Financials
FATN vs. NVGS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FatPipe, Inc and Navigator Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FATN vs. NVGS - Profitability Comparison
FATN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, FatPipe, Inc reported a gross profit of 4.64M and revenue of 5.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.3%.
NVGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Navigator Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 41.66M and revenue of 140.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.6%.
FATN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, FatPipe, Inc reported an operating income of 901.47K and revenue of 5.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.9%.
NVGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Navigator Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 31.41M and revenue of 140.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.3%.
FATN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, FatPipe, Inc reported a net income of 1.23M and revenue of 5.03M, resulting in a net margin of 24.4%.
NVGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Navigator Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 35.46M and revenue of 140.62M, resulting in a net margin of 25.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FATN and NVGS have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FATN has higher volatility (31.02%) compared to NVGS (8.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FATN dropped -88.85% vs NVGS's -87.68%.
NVGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FATN and NVGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer