PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVGS vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NVGS vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVGS achieves a 30.10% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 7.60% return. Over the past 10 years, NVGS has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 8.03%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.71% annualized return.


NVGS

1D
2.19%
1M
-3.24%
YTD
30.10%
6M
30.47%
1Y
55.63%
3Y*
22.03%
5Y*
15.74%
10Y*
8.03%

^GSPC

1D
-1.44%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
7.60%
6M
6.59%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
13.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVGS vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVGS
Navigator Holdings Ltd.
30.10%14.44%6.79%22.52%34.84%-19.00%-18.71%43.30%-4.57%5.91%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
7.60%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between NVGS and ^GSPC is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2007

0.24

The correlation between NVGS and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.30 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVGS vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVGS
NVGS Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
NVGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVGS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
NVGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVGS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVGS vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVGS^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.32

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

2.46

+1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.56

10.92

-0.36

NVGS vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVGS Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVGS and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVGS vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVGS drawdown since its inception was -87.68%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVGS and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVGS^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.68%

-56.78%

-30.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.15%

-9.10%

-6.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.88%

-18.90%

-19.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.88%

-25.43%

-13.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.33%

-33.92%

-39.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.04%

-3.21%

-22.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.99%

-10.71%

-33.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.28%

2.04%

+3.24%

Volatility

NVGS vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.89%. This indicates that NVGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVGS^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.54%

4.89%

+2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.30%

9.93%

+12.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.05%

12.57%

+15.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.68%

17.00%

+18.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.62%

18.08%

+29.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVGS and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVGS has higher volatility (7.54%) compared to ^GSPC (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVGS dropped -87.68% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

NVGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVGS and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer