PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FATN vs. ERNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FATN vs. ERNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FatPipe, Inc (FATN) and Eterna Therapeutics Inc (ERNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FATN achieves a 164.85% return, which is significantly higher than ERNA's -79.80% return.


FATN

1D
-0.19%
1M
-11.57%
6M
152.36%
YTD
164.85%
1Y
-38.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ERNA

1D
2.19%
1M
-1.46%
6M
-81.50%
YTD
-79.80%
1Y
-87.57%
3Y*
-81.25%
5Y*
-85.57%
10Y*
-62.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FATN vs. ERNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FATN
FatPipe, Inc
164.85%-68.92%
ERNA
Eterna Therapeutics Inc
-79.80%-57.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FATN and ERNA is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2025

0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FATN:

$75.04M

ERNA:

$1.90M

EPS

FATN:

$0.08

ERNA:

-$23.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

FATN:

$15.13M

ERNA:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

FATN:

$13.71M

ERNA:

-$69.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

FATN:

$2.19M

ERNA:

-$11.25M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FATN vs. ERNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FATN
FATN Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FATN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FATN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FATN Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FATN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FATN Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

ERNA
ERNA Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
ERNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNA Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNA Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FATN vs. ERNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FatPipe, Inc (FATN) and Eterna Therapeutics Inc (ERNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FATNERNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.87

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

-0.94

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.72

-1.38

+0.65

FATN vs. ERNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FATN Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is higher than the ERNA Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FATN and ERNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FATN vs. ERNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FATN drawdown since its inception was -88.85%, smaller than the maximum ERNA drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FATN and ERNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FATNERNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.85%

-100.00%

+11.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-83.69%

-93.32%

+9.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-100.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.85%

-100.00%

+41.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.73%

-86.18%

+25.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

60.18%

63.64%

-3.46%

Volatility

FATN vs. ERNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FatPipe, Inc (FATN) is 23.13%, while Eterna Therapeutics Inc (ERNA) has a volatility of 26.61%. This indicates that FATN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FATNERNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.13%

26.61%

-3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

114.25%

130.04%

-15.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

149.13%

151.77%

-2.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

180.96%

114.08%

+66.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

180.96%

149.04%

+31.92%

Dividends

FATN vs. ERNA - Dividend Comparison

Neither FATN nor ERNA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

FATN vs. ERNA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FatPipe, Inc and Eterna Therapeutics Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00M2.00M3.00M4.00M5.00MOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
4.09M
0
(FATN) Total Revenue
(ERNA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FATN and ERNA have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ERNA has higher volatility (26.61%) compared to FATN (23.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FATN dropped -88.85% vs ERNA's -100.00%.

FATN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.29 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FATN and ERNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer