FATEX vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FATEX (Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FATEX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FATEX charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

FATEX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M (FATEX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FATEX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBGRX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 9.10%
• YTD: 18.56%
• 6M: 19.76%
• 1Y: 44.98%
• 3Y*: 32.54%
• 5Y*: 17.08%
• 10Y*: 21.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FATEX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FATEX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M	0.00%	24.05%	34.69%	58.93%	-36.34%	26.95%	63.52%	50.18%	-8.78%	49.01%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	18.56%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	33.43%	1.02%	36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FATEX and FBGRX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 1996	0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between FATEX and FBGRX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FATEX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FATEX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M (FATEX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FATEX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.68	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FATEX	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-58.64%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.65%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.07%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.08%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-12.53%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.98%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FATEX	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.14%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	17.44%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	24.88%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	23.69%	—

FATEX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FATEX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FATEX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FATEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.39%, more than FBGRX's 1.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FATEX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M	12.39%	12.39%	8.86%	4.29%	4.07%	13.60%	8.26%	2.48%	25.20%	8.44%	1.60%	4.60%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.60%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FATEX and FBGRX in my portfolio?

FATEX and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.