FATEX vs. EPGAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M (FATEX) and Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A (EPGAX).
FATEX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996. EPGAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FATEX or EPGAX.
Key characteristics
| FATEX | EPGAX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 33.46% | 30.39% |
| 1Y Return | 36.12% | 37.72% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.42% | 3.94% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 16.66% | 11.59% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 13.97% | 9.73% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.56 | 2.40 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.10 | 3.18 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.28 | 1.43 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.60 | 0.51 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.26 | 13.31 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.99% | 2.81% |
| Daily Std Dev | 23.17% | 15.60% |
| Max Drawdown | -82.59% | -95.79% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.93% | -63.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between FATEX and EPGAX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FATEX vs. EPGAX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FATEX achieves a 33.46% return, which is significantly higher than EPGAX's 30.39% return. Over the past 10 years, FATEX has outperformed EPGAX with an annualized return of 13.97%, while EPGAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.73% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FATEX vs. EPGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FATEX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than EPGAX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FATEX vs. EPGAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M (FATEX) and Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A (EPGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FATEX vs. EPGAX - Dividend Comparison
Neither FATEX nor EPGAX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FATEX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.60% | 8.70% | 1.18% |
EPGAX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FATEX vs. EPGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FATEX drawdown since its inception was -82.59%, smaller than the maximum EPGAX drawdown of -95.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FATEX and EPGAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FATEX vs. EPGAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M (FATEX) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A (EPGAX) at 4.17%. This indicates that FATEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.