FATEX vs. FSBDX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M (FATEX) and Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX).

FATEX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996. FSBDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013.

Performance

FATEX vs. FSBDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M (FATEX) and Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FATEX vs. FSBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FATEX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M	0.00%	24.05%	34.69%	58.93%	-36.34%	26.95%	63.52%	50.18%	-8.78%	49.01%
FSBDX Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund	-10.92%	20.31%	39.76%	57.42%	-37.20%	22.53%	62.77%	33.24%	4.53%	35.27%

Returns By Period

FATEX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FSBDX

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: -8.78%
• YTD: -10.92%
• 6M: -7.85%
• 1Y: 23.48%
• 3Y*: 25.27%
• 5Y*: 11.81%
• 10Y*: 19.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FATEX vs. FSBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FATEX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than FSBDX's 0.00% expense ratio.

FATEX

Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M

FSBDX

Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund

Return for Risk

FATEX vs. FSBDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSBDX

FSBDX Risk / Return Rank: 58
FSBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FSBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FSBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FSBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FSBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FATEX vs. FSBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M (FATEX) and Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FATEX	FSBDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.95	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.79	—

Correlation

The correlation between FATEX and FSBDX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FATEX vs. FSBDX - Dividend Comparison

FATEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.39%, more than FSBDX's 4.19% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FATEX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M	12.39%	12.39%	8.86%	4.29%	4.07%	13.60%	8.26%	2.48%	25.20%	8.44%	1.60%	4.60%
FSBDX Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund	4.19%	3.73%	8.92%	0.54%	3.93%	24.67%	40.16%	11.36%	15.87%	10.80%	1.41%	13.10%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FATEX	FSBDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-42.25%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.65%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-42.25%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-12.41%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-7.32%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.41%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FATEX	FSBDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.32%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	24.53%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	24.75%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	23.41%	—