FATEX vs. FSCSX

In the year-to-date period, FATEX achieves a -24.64% return, which is significantly lower than FSCSX's -19.87% return. Over the past 10 years, FATEX has outperformed FSCSX with an annualized return of 9.30%, while FSCSX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.88% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FATEX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than FSCSX's 0.67% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M (FATEX) and Fidelity Select Software & IT Services Portfolio (FSCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FATEX Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is higher than the FSCSX Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FATEX and FSCSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither FATEX nor FSCSX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum FATEX drawdown since its inception was -82.59%, which is greater than FSCSX's maximum drawdown of -58.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FATEX and FSCSX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M (FATEX) has a higher volatility of 13.26% compared to Fidelity Select Software & IT Services Portfolio (FSCSX) at 10.83%. This indicates that FATEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.