FASMX vs. FFANX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FASMX (Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund) and FFANX (Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, FASMX returned 7.77%/yr vs 6.87%/yr for FFANX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FASMX charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for FFANX.

Performance

FASMX vs. FFANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FASMX achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly higher than FFANX's 7.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FASMX has outperformed FFANX with an annualized return of 7.77%, while FFANX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.87% annualized return.

FASMX

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 3.31%
• YTD: 9.03%
• 6M: 9.69%
• 1Y: 20.66%
• 3Y*: 13.10%
• 5Y*: 6.46%
• 10Y*: 7.77%

FFANX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 2.73%
• YTD: 7.52%
• 6M: 8.05%
• 1Y: 17.63%
• 3Y*: 11.40%
• 5Y*: 5.55%
• 10Y*: 6.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FASMX vs. FFANX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FASMX Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund	9.03%	14.94%	8.46%	13.09%	-14.93%	9.86%	14.72%	18.25%	-5.51%	11.73%
FFANX Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund	7.52%	13.16%	7.40%	11.52%	-13.62%	8.03%	13.10%	15.81%	-4.06%	11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FASMX and FFANX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2007	0.99

The correlation between FASMX and FFANX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

FASMX vs. FFANX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FASMX	FFANX
Technology	26.1%	26.1%
Financial Services	16.5%	16.5%
Industrials	13.2%	13.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	9.3%
Healthcare	9.0%	8.9%
Communication Services	7.8%	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	5.0%
Basic Materials	4.5%	4.5%
Energy	3.8%	3.8%
Utilities	2.6%	2.6%
Real Estate	2.3%	2.3%

Return for Risk

FASMX vs. FFANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FASMX

FASMX Risk / Return Rank: 79
FASMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FASMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FASMX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FASMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FASMX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

FFANX

FFANX Risk / Return Rank: 81
FFANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FFANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FFANX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FFANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FFANX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FASMX vs. FFANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FASMX	FFANX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	2.71	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.78	3.93	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.53	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.38	3.44	-0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.80	15.00	-0.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FASMX vs. FFANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FASMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the FFANX Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASMX and FFANX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FASMX	FFANX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.65	2.71	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.71	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	0.90	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.68	+0.17

Drawdowns

FASMX vs. FFANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FASMX drawdown since its inception was -37.75%, which is greater than FFANX's maximum drawdown of -31.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASMX and FFANX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FASMX	FFANX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.75%	-31.69%	-6.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.19%	-5.20%	-0.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.28%	-7.55%	-1.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.54%	-18.52%	-2.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.27%	-18.52%	-2.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.12%	-3.80%	-0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.41%	1.19%	+0.22%

Volatility

FASMX vs. FFANX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) at 2.28%. This indicates that FASMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FASMX	FFANX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.67%	2.28%	+0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.50%	5.45%	+1.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.91%	6.60%	+1.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.32%	7.86%	+1.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.31%	7.70%	+1.61%

FASMX vs. FFANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FASMX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than FFANX's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

FASMX vs. FFANX - Dividend Comparison

FASMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%, more than FFANX's 3.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FASMX Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund	6.93%	7.58%	3.88%	2.18%	6.78%	2.91%	2.40%	4.21%	5.11%	2.24%	1.69%	5.77%
FFANX Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund	3.65%	3.97%	2.81%	2.49%	5.75%	2.35%	2.36%	3.67%	4.56%	2.56%	1.43%	3.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FASMX and FFANX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, FASMX and FFANX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FASMX or FFANX?

FASMX has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to FFANX (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FASMX dropped -37.75% vs FFANX's -31.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.