FASMX vs. VWIAX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FASMX (Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund) and VWIAX (Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund Admiral Shares) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, FASMX returned 7.73%/yr vs 5.85%/yr for VWIAX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FASMX charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for VWIAX.

Performance

FASMX vs. VWIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX) and Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund Admiral Shares (VWIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FASMX achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly higher than VWIAX's 3.28% return. Over the past 10 years, FASMX has outperformed VWIAX with an annualized return of 7.73%, while VWIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.85% annualized return.

FASMX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 2.65%
• YTD: 8.62%
• 6M: 9.60%
• 1Y: 20.38%
• 3Y*: 12.96%
• 5Y*: 6.29%
• 10Y*: 7.73%

VWIAX

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 3.28%
• 6M: 3.86%
• 1Y: 11.41%
• 3Y*: 8.83%
• 5Y*: 4.16%
• 10Y*: 5.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FASMX vs. VWIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FASMX Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund	8.62%	14.94%	8.46%	13.09%	-14.93%	9.86%	14.72%	18.25%	-5.51%	11.73%
VWIAX Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund Admiral Shares	3.28%	11.08%	5.92%	7.07%	-9.04%	8.55%	8.52%	16.47%	-2.49%	9.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FASMX and VWIAX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2001	0.80

The correlation between FASMX and VWIAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FASMX vs. VWIAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FASMX	VWIAX
Technology	26.1%	4.2%
Financial Services	16.5%	7.9%
Industrials	13.2%	3.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	1.9%
Healthcare	9.0%	5.7%
Communication Services	7.8%	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	3.6%
Basic Materials	4.5%	1.4%
Energy	3.8%	3.1%
Utilities	2.6%	3.6%
Real Estate	2.3%	1.1%

Return for Risk

FASMX vs. VWIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FASMX

FASMX Risk / Return Rank: 78
FASMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FASMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FASMX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FASMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FASMX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

VWIAX

VWIAX Risk / Return Rank: 54
VWIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
VWIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
VWIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
VWIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
VWIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FASMX vs. VWIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX) and Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund Admiral Shares (VWIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FASMX	VWIAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	2.23	+0.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.76	3.21	+0.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.41	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	2.78	+0.56
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.65	10.48	+4.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FASMX vs. VWIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FASMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the VWIAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASMX and VWIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FASMX	VWIAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.63	2.23	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.60	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	0.85	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.93	-0.08

Drawdowns

FASMX vs. VWIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FASMX drawdown since its inception was -37.75%, which is greater than VWIAX's maximum drawdown of -21.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASMX and VWIAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FASMX	VWIAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.75%	-21.64%	-16.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.19%	-4.15%	-2.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.28%	-6.96%	-2.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.54%	-15.26%	-5.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.27%	-17.41%	-3.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.21%	+0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.12%	-2.22%	-1.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.41%	1.10%	+0.31%

Volatility

FASMX vs. VWIAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund Admiral Shares (VWIAX) at 1.64%. This indicates that FASMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FASMX	VWIAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	1.64%	+1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.50%	3.89%	+2.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.92%	5.13%	+2.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.32%	6.97%	+2.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.31%	6.92%	+2.39%

FASMX vs. VWIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FASMX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than VWIAX's 0.16% expense ratio.

Dividends

FASMX vs. VWIAX - Dividend Comparison

FASMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.96%, less than VWIAX's 7.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FASMX Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund	6.96%	7.58%	3.88%	2.18%	6.78%	2.91%	2.40%	4.21%	5.11%	2.24%	1.69%	5.77%
VWIAX Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund Admiral Shares	7.78%	7.93%	6.69%	4.80%	7.75%	6.11%	4.37%	4.00%	7.64%	3.25%	4.07%	5.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FASMX and VWIAX in my portfolio?

FASMX and VWIAX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FASMX or VWIAX?

FASMX has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to VWIAX (1.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FASMX dropped -37.75% vs VWIAX's -21.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FASMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.