FASMX vs. VTI
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI).
FASMX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 28, 1988. VTI is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Total Market Index. It was launched on Jun 27, 2016.
Performance
FASMX vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FASMX vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASMX Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund | -2.02% | 14.94% | 8.46% | 13.09% | -14.93% | 9.86% | 14.72% | 18.25% | -5.51% | 11.73% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | -4.01% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FASMX achieves a -2.02% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's -4.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FASMX has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 6.84%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 13.60% annualized return.
FASMX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -5.86%
- YTD
- -2.02%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 12.51%
- 3Y*
- 9.57%
- 5Y*
- 4.94%
- 10Y*
- 6.84%
VTI
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- -4.01%
- 6M
- -1.66%
- 1Y
- 18.11%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FASMX vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FASMX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FASMX vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
FASMX
VTI
FASMX vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FASMX | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 0.96 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.87 | 1.48 | +0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.23 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 1.52 | +0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.35 | 7.26 | +0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FASMX | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 0.96 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.60 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.48 | +0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between FASMX and VTI is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FASMX vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
FASMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.74%, more than VTI's 1.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASMX Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund | 7.74% | 7.58% | 3.88% | 2.18% | 6.78% | 2.91% | 2.40% | 4.21% | 5.11% | 2.24% | 1.69% | 5.77% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.17% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Drawdowns
FASMX vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FASMX drawdown since its inception was -37.75%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASMX and VTI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FASMX | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.75% | -55.45% | +17.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.84% | -12.30% | +5.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.54% | -25.36% | +4.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.27% | -35.00% | +13.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.19% | -6.25% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -8.08% | +3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 2.58% | -0.99% |
Volatility
FASMX vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX) is 3.59%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that FASMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FASMX | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 5.45% | -1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.90% | 9.73% | -3.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.51% | 19.01% | -9.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.21% | 17.42% | -8.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.24% | 18.29% | -9.05% |