PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FASGX vs. NWQIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FASGX vs. NWQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) and Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FASGX achieves a 11.93% return, which is significantly higher than NWQIX's 5.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FASGX has outperformed NWQIX with an annualized return of 10.01%, while NWQIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.68% annualized return.


FASGX

1D
0.51%
1M
4.40%
YTD
11.93%
6M
12.90%
1Y
26.54%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
10.01%

NWQIX

1D
0.15%
1M
1.57%
YTD
5.19%
6M
6.53%
1Y
15.18%
3Y*
10.84%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
5.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FASGX vs. NWQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
11.93%18.23%10.81%16.45%-16.83%13.98%17.19%22.81%-7.65%17.34%
NWQIX
Nuveen Flexible Income Fund
5.19%12.22%6.03%11.61%-13.64%4.94%5.54%18.57%-4.07%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FASGX and NWQIX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.68

The correlation between FASGX and NWQIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FASGX vs. NWQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FASGX
FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

NWQIX
NWQIX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
NWQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
NWQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FASGX vs. NWQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) and Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FASGXNWQIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.93

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

5.31

-1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.98

25.30

-10.33

FASGX vs. NWQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FASGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is lower than the NWQIX Sharpe Ratio of 4.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASGX and NWQIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FASGXNWQIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

4.06

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.80

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.90

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.77

-0.14

Drawdowns

FASGX vs. NWQIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FASGX drawdown since its inception was -47.35%, which is greater than NWQIX's maximum drawdown of -23.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASGX and NWQIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FASGXNWQIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.35%

-23.89%

-23.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-2.94%

-5.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.80%

-4.59%

-8.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.54%

-17.75%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.20%

-23.89%

-3.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.71%

-3.01%

-3.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

0.61%

+1.18%

Volatility

FASGX vs. NWQIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX) at 1.22%. This indicates that FASGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FASGXNWQIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

1.22%

+2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.39%

3.06%

+5.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.34%

3.85%

+6.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.27%

5.68%

+6.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.65%

6.33%

+6.32%

FASGX vs. NWQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FASGX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than NWQIX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FASGX vs. NWQIX - Dividend Comparison

FASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, more than NWQIX's 5.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
6.55%7.33%4.60%1.72%6.69%2.73%2.20%5.19%6.31%2.75%0.20%5.58%
NWQIX
Nuveen Flexible Income Fund
5.93%6.52%5.20%7.84%7.02%4.39%4.82%5.71%6.23%5.67%5.52%5.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


FASGX and NWQIX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FASGX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to NWQIX (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FASGX dropped -47.35% vs NWQIX's -23.89%.

NWQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.06 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FASGX and NWQIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer