FASEX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
FASEX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Dec 22, 1987. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
FASEX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FASEX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASEX Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund | 2.64% | 9.68% | 10.40% | 14.20% | -10.63% | 34.84% | 1.19% | 26.68% | -13.00% | 19.23% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FASEX achieves a 2.64% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FASEX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 9.89%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
FASEX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -6.34%
- YTD
- 2.64%
- 6M
- 3.59%
- 1Y
- 17.10%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- 7.98%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FASEX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FASEX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FASEX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
FASEX
FGIAX
FASEX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FASEX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 1.75 | -0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.42 | 2.26 | -0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.35 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 2.61 | -1.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.84 | 12.12 | -7.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FASEX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 1.75 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.80 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.58 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.42 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between FASEX and FGIAX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FASEX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
FASEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.29%, more than FGIAX's 9.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASEX Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund | 14.29% | 14.67% | 5.29% | 3.12% | 6.32% | 4.02% | 1.06% | 0.89% | 4.48% | 7.93% | 3.67% | 3.49% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
FASEX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FASEX drawdown since its inception was -55.57%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASEX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FASEX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.57% | -49.35% | -6.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.62% | -8.29% | -5.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.26% | -21.08% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.56% | -38.02% | -6.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.83% | -3.78% | -3.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.97% | -7.22% | -1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 1.78% | +1.23% |
Volatility
FASEX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that FASEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FASEX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | 4.05% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.91% | 7.09% | +2.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.72% | 12.28% | +6.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 13.08% | +4.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 15.17% | +5.00% |