PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FASEX vs. ACMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FASEX vs. ACMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX) and American Century Mid Cap Value Fund (ACMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FASEX achieves a 19.73% return, which is significantly higher than ACMVX's 8.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FASEX has outperformed ACMVX with an annualized return of 11.30%, while ACMVX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.99% annualized return.


FASEX

1D
0.79%
1M
3.49%
YTD
19.73%
6M
18.08%
1Y
32.90%
3Y*
16.10%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*
11.30%

ACMVX

1D
0.06%
1M
0.88%
YTD
8.82%
6M
7.87%
1Y
17.56%
3Y*
9.99%
5Y*
7.96%
10Y*
8.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FASEX vs. ACMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FASEX
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund
19.73%9.68%10.40%14.20%-10.63%34.84%1.19%26.68%-13.00%19.23%
ACMVX
American Century Mid Cap Value Fund
8.82%8.77%8.50%6.18%-1.34%23.41%1.63%28.89%-12.63%11.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FASEX and ACMVX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2004

0.94

The correlation between FASEX and ACMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FASEX vs. ACMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FASEX
FASEX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FASEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FASEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

ACMVX
ACMVX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ACMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
ACMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FASEX vs. ACMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX) and American Century Mid Cap Value Fund (ACMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FASEXACMVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.26

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.55

2.09

+2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.56

6.75

+9.81

FASEX vs. ACMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FASEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the ACMVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASEX and ACMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FASEX vs. ACMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FASEX drawdown since its inception was -55.57%, which is greater than ACMVX's maximum drawdown of -51.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASEX and ACMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FASEXACMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.57%

-51.19%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.37%

-8.49%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.26%

-14.57%

-7.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.26%

-17.46%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.56%

-39.24%

-5.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-1.72%

+1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.92%

-5.91%

-3.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

2.62%

-0.61%

Volatility

FASEX vs. ACMVX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to American Century Mid Cap Value Fund (ACMVX) at 3.31%. This indicates that FASEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FASEXACMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.30%

3.31%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.44%

8.63%

+1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.95%

11.96%

+1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.08%

14.64%

+3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.22%

17.45%

+2.77%

FASEX vs. ACMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FASEX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than ACMVX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

FASEX vs. ACMVX - Dividend Comparison

FASEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.25%, less than ACMVX's 14.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACMVX
American Century Mid Cap Value Fund
14.00%14.46%8.76%5.24%15.00%15.95%1.83%1.46%14.51%9.49%4.05%11.06%
FASEX
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund
12.25%14.67%5.29%3.12%6.32%4.02%1.06%0.89%4.48%7.93%3.67%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


FASEX and ACMVX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FASEX has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to ACMVX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FASEX dropped -55.57% vs ACMVX's -51.19%.

FASEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FASEX and ACMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer