FASEX vs. MVCAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX) and MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX).
FASEX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Dec 22, 1987. MVCAX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Aug 31, 2001.
Performance
FASEX vs. MVCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FASEX vs. MVCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASEX Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund | 5.31% | 9.68% | 10.40% | 14.20% | -10.63% | 34.84% | 1.19% | 26.68% | -13.00% | 19.23% |
MVCAX MFS Mid Cap Value Fund | 1.03% | 6.09% | 13.57% | 12.51% | -8.96% | 30.43% | 4.03% | 30.57% | -11.69% | 13.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FASEX achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly higher than MVCAX's 1.03% return. Over the past 10 years, FASEX has outperformed MVCAX with an annualized return of 10.18%, while MVCAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.26% annualized return.
FASEX
- 1D
- 2.60%
- 1M
- -4.13%
- YTD
- 5.31%
- 6M
- 6.24%
- 1Y
- 19.76%
- 3Y*
- 12.75%
- 5Y*
- 8.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.18%
MVCAX
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- -6.47%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- 9.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.87%
- 5Y*
- 7.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FASEX vs. MVCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FASEX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than MVCAX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FASEX vs. MVCAX — Risk / Return Rank
FASEX
MVCAX
FASEX vs. MVCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX) and MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FASEX | MVCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 0.54 | +0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.58 | 0.89 | +0.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.12 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 0.80 | +0.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.16 | 3.14 | +3.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FASEX | MVCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 0.54 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.42 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.48 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.43 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between FASEX and MVCAX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FASEX vs. MVCAX - Dividend Comparison
FASEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.93%, more than MVCAX's 8.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASEX Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund | 13.93% | 14.67% | 5.29% | 3.12% | 6.32% | 4.02% | 1.06% | 0.89% | 4.48% | 7.93% | 3.67% | 3.49% |
MVCAX MFS Mid Cap Value Fund | 8.12% | 8.21% | 10.99% | 2.73% | 5.22% | 5.70% | 0.80% | 2.03% | 6.36% | 3.36% | 0.07% | 4.59% |
Drawdowns
FASEX vs. MVCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FASEX drawdown since its inception was -55.57%, smaller than the maximum MVCAX drawdown of -60.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASEX and MVCAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FASEX | MVCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.57% | -60.41% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.62% | -13.55% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.26% | -21.05% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.56% | -42.79% | -1.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.40% | -7.35% | +2.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.97% | -8.17% | -0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 3.45% | -0.43% |
Volatility
FASEX vs. MVCAX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX) at 5.22%. This indicates that FASEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FASEX | MVCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 5.22% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.16% | 10.17% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.85% | 18.64% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 17.24% | +0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 19.25% | +0.93% |