FAPCX vs. SLQD

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FAPCX (Fidelity International Capital Appreciation K6 Fund) and SLQD (iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both funds - FAPCX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while SLQD is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade 0-5 Index. Over the past 5 years, FAPCX returned 6.60%/yr vs 2.53%/yr for SLQD. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FAPCX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SLQD.

Performance

FAPCX vs. SLQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Capital Appreciation K6 Fund (FAPCX) and iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAPCX achieves a 7.72% return, which is significantly higher than SLQD's 1.01% return.

FAPCX

• 1D: 4.73%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 7.72%
• 6M: 9.22%
• 1Y: 10.33%
• 3Y*: 14.88%
• 5Y*: 6.60%
• 10Y*: —

SLQD

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 1.01%
• 6M: 1.39%
• 1Y: 4.39%
• 3Y*: 5.51%
• 5Y*: 2.53%
• 10Y*: 2.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAPCX vs. SLQD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAPCX Fidelity International Capital Appreciation K6 Fund	7.72%	18.82%	8.28%	27.54%	-26.25%	12.43%	22.82%	33.52%	-12.55%	15.61%
SLQD iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	1.01%	6.27%	4.94%	5.98%	-4.38%	-0.61%	4.76%	6.09%	1.09%	0.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FAPCX and SLQD is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017	0.24

The correlation between FAPCX and SLQD shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FAPCX vs. SLQD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAPCX

FAPCX Risk / Return Rank: 11
FAPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
FAPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
FAPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
FAPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
FAPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

SLQD

SLQD Risk / Return Rank: 92
SLQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
SLQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
SLQD Omega Ratio Rank: 94
SLQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
SLQD Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAPCX vs. SLQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Capital Appreciation K6 Fund (FAPCX) and iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAPCX	SLQD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.56	2.96	-2.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	4.75	-3.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.61	-0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.73	4.15	-3.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.73	18.78	-16.04

FAPCX vs. SLQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAPCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the SLQD Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAPCX and SLQD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FAPCX vs. SLQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAPCX drawdown since its inception was -37.09%, which is greater than SLQD's maximum drawdown of -12.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAPCX and SLQD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAPCX	SLQD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.09%	-12.69%	-24.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.45%	-1.06%	-13.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.28%	-1.06%	-15.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.09%	-7.63%	-29.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-12.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.13%	-0.02%	-2.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.72%	-0.87%	-6.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.84%	0.23%	+3.61%

Volatility

FAPCX vs. SLQD - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Capital Appreciation K6 Fund (FAPCX) has a higher volatility of 9.28% compared to iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) at 0.53%. This indicates that FAPCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAPCX	SLQD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.28%	0.53%	+8.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.79%	1.13%	+15.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.74%	1.49%	+17.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.05%	2.44%	+16.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.72%	3.14%	+15.58%

FAPCX vs. SLQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAPCX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SLQD's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAPCX vs. SLQD - Dividend Comparison

FAPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%, more than SLQD's 4.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAPCX Fidelity International Capital Appreciation K6 Fund	8.80%	9.48%	2.94%	0.42%	0.40%	8.83%	0.41%	0.87%	0.81%	1.95%	0.00%	0.00%
SLQD iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	4.31%	4.15%	3.71%	2.99%	2.00%	1.67%	2.34%	2.89%	2.55%	1.98%	1.81%	1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAPCX and SLQD in my portfolio?

FAPCX and SLQD have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAPCX or SLQD?

FAPCX has higher volatility (9.28%) compared to SLQD (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAPCX dropped -37.09% vs SLQD's -12.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLQD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.