PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FAN vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FAN vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FAN (First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FAN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the ISE Clean Edge Global Wind Energy Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FAN returned 9.88%/yr vs 15.61%/yr for VOO. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FAN charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

FAN vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAN achieves a 20.47% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FAN has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 9.88%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.

FAN

1D
-2.65%
1M
-5.81%
YTD
20.47%
6M
20.15%
1Y
38.86%
3Y*
14.67%
5Y*
4.21%
10Y*
9.88%

VOO

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
8.19%
6M
7.24%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAN vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAN
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF		20.47%40.38%-8.96%-3.20%-13.12%-11.63%61.16%31.22%-11.40%16.30%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF		8.19%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FAN and VOO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.65

The correlation between FAN and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

FAN vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FAN
VOO

Utilities

55.7%
2.5%

Industrials

41.3%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

1.7%
9.8%

Energy

1.1%
3.2%

Basic Materials

0.3%
1.7%

Communication Services

-

10.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Financial Services

-

10.9%

Healthcare

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

39.1%

Utilities

FAN
55.7%
VOO
2.5%

Industrials

FAN
41.3%
VOO
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FAN
1.7%
VOO
9.8%

Energy

FAN
1.1%
VOO
3.2%

Basic Materials

FAN
0.3%
VOO
1.7%

Communication Services

FAN

-

VOO
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

FAN

-

VOO
4.5%

Financial Services

FAN

-

VOO
10.9%

Healthcare

FAN

-

VOO
8.3%

Real Estate

FAN

-

VOO
1.8%

Technology

FAN

-

VOO
39.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

Often compared with FAN:
FAN vs. TANFAN vs. ICLNFAN vs. QCLNFAN vs. PBDFAN vs. RAYSFAN vs. GRIDFAN vs. CTEC
Often compared with VOO:
VOO vs. VTIVOO vs. QQQVOO vs. SCHDVOO vs. VTVOO vs. SPYVOO vs. FXAIXVOO vs. VGT

Return for Risk

FAN vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FAN
FAN Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAN Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAN Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAN vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FANVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.91
1.91

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.57
2.60

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.35

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

2.67

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.64

11.96

-0.32

FAN vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAN and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAN vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAN drawdown since its inception was -79.94%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAN and VOO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FANVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.94%

-33.99%

-45.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

-8.90%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.46%

-18.69%

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.45%

-24.52%

-13.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.29%

-33.99%

-12.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.44%

-3.14%

-6.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.08%

-3.68%

-41.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

1.99%

+1.36%

Volatility

FAN vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) has a higher volatility of 6.87% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.83%. This indicates that FAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FANVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.87%

4.83%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.93%

9.82%

+6.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.41%

12.46%

+7.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.42%

16.91%

+4.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.96%

18.02%

+2.94%

FAN vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAN has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAN vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than VOO's 1.05% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAN
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF		1.03%1.35%1.52%1.71%1.50%1.79%0.84%2.42%2.67%2.59%6.04%2.35%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF		1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

FAN and VOO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAN has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to VOO (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAN dropped -79.94% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.61% vs 9.88% for FAN. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.61% return vs 9.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for FAN.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 1.03% for FAN.

FAN is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. FAN tracks ISE Clean Edge Global Wind Energy Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for FAN and 0.03% for VOO.

FAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAN and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer