PortfoliosLab logo
FAN vs. ICLN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FAN and ICLN is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FAN vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FAN:

0.01

ICLN:

-0.29

Sortino Ratio

FAN:

0.25

ICLN:

-0.14

Omega Ratio

FAN:

1.03

ICLN:

0.98

Calmar Ratio

FAN:

0.04

ICLN:

-0.07

Martin Ratio

FAN:

0.14

ICLN:

-0.31

Ulcer Index

FAN:

11.41%

ICLN:

16.35%

Daily Std Dev

FAN:

21.34%

ICLN:

23.49%

Max Drawdown

FAN:

-81.36%

ICLN:

-87.15%

Current Drawdown

FAN:

-31.74%

ICLN:

-65.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAN achieves a 12.65% return, which is significantly lower than ICLN's 13.62% return. Over the past 10 years, FAN has outperformed ICLN with an annualized return of 5.56%, while ICLN has yielded a comparatively lower 1.89% annualized return.


FAN

YTD

12.65%

1M

10.70%

6M

7.39%

1Y

0.26%

5Y*

7.52%

10Y*

5.56%

ICLN

YTD

13.62%

1M

13.52%

6M

9.07%

1Y

-6.86%

5Y*

4.89%

10Y*

1.89%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FAN vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAN has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than ICLN's 0.46% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FAN vs. ICLN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FAN is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FAN is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FAN is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FAN is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FAN is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FAN is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

ICLN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ICLN is 1010
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ICLN is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ICLN is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ICLN is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ICLN is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ICLN is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FAN vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FAN Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is higher than the ICLN Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAN and ICLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FAN vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison

FAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than ICLN's 1.62% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FAN
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF
1.32%1.52%1.72%1.50%1.80%0.83%2.42%2.68%2.59%6.04%2.36%2.61%
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
1.62%1.85%1.59%0.89%1.18%0.34%1.36%2.77%2.49%3.88%2.36%2.83%

Drawdowns

FAN vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAN drawdown since its inception was -81.36%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -87.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAN and ICLN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FAN vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) is 3.89%, while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a volatility of 6.01%. This indicates that FAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...