PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FAN vs. ICLN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FANICLN
YTD Return-4.01%-21.07%
1Y Return6.99%-11.89%
3Y Return (Ann)-7.69%-20.12%
5Y Return (Ann)4.12%3.71%
10Y Return (Ann)6.23%3.93%
Sharpe Ratio0.36-0.46
Sortino Ratio0.62-0.51
Omega Ratio1.080.94
Calmar Ratio0.17-0.17
Martin Ratio1.20-1.05
Ulcer Index5.65%10.92%
Daily Std Dev18.79%24.89%
Max Drawdown-81.36%-87.16%
Current Drawdown-36.12%-67.70%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between FAN and ICLN is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

FAN vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FAN achieves a -4.01% return, which is significantly higher than ICLN's -21.07% return. Over the past 10 years, FAN has outperformed ICLN with an annualized return of 6.23%, while ICLN has yielded a comparatively lower 3.93% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-8.24%
-13.75%
FAN
ICLN

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FAN vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAN has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than ICLN's 0.46% expense ratio.


FAN
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF
Expense ratio chart for FAN: current value at 0.62% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.62%
Expense ratio chart for ICLN: current value at 0.46% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.46%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FAN vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FAN, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.000.36
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FAN, currently valued at 0.62, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.62
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FAN, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.08
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FAN, currently valued at 0.17, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.17
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FAN, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.001.20
ICLN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ICLN, currently valued at -0.46, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.46
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ICLN, currently valued at -0.51, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00-0.51
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ICLN, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.000.94
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ICLN, currently valued at -0.17, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.17
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ICLN, currently valued at -1.05, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.00-1.05

FAN vs. ICLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAN Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is higher than the ICLN Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAN and ICLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.36
-0.46
FAN
ICLN

Dividends

FAN vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison

FAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than ICLN's 1.79% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FAN
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF
1.52%1.72%1.50%1.80%0.83%2.42%2.68%2.59%6.04%2.36%2.61%0.71%
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
1.79%1.59%0.89%1.18%0.34%1.36%2.77%2.49%3.88%2.36%2.83%2.11%

Drawdowns

FAN vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAN drawdown since its inception was -81.36%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -87.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAN and ICLN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-36.12%
-67.70%
FAN
ICLN

Volatility

FAN vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) is 7.82%, while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a volatility of 9.46%. This indicates that FAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.82%
9.46%
FAN
ICLN