FALN vs. HYXU
FALN (iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF) and HYXU (iShares Euro High Yield Corporate Bond USD Hedged ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds from iShares - FALN tracks the Bloomberg US High Yield Fallen Angel 3% Capped Index while HYXU tracks the BBG Pan-European High Yield (Euro) Total Return 100% USD Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. FALN charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for HYXU.
Performance
FALN vs. HYXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FALN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 9.07%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.89%
- 10Y*
- —
HYXU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FALN vs. HYXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FALN iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF | 0.29% |
HYXU iShares Euro High Yield Corporate Bond USD Hedged ETF | 0.00% |
FALN vs. HYXU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FALN
HYXU
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
FALN
HYXU
-
Basic Materials
FALN
-
HYXU
-
Communication Services
FALN
-
HYXU
Consumer Cyclical
FALN
-
HYXU
-
Consumer Defensive
FALN
-
HYXU
-
Energy
FALN
-
HYXU
-
Financial Services
FALN
-
HYXU
-
Healthcare
FALN
-
HYXU
-
Industrials
FALN
-
HYXU
-
Technology
FALN
-
HYXU
-
Utilities
FALN
-
HYXU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FALN vs. HYXU — Risk / Return Rank
FALN
HYXU
FALN vs. HYXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) and iShares Euro High Yield Corporate Bond USD Hedged ETF (HYXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FALN | HYXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.01 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.91 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.55 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FALN | HYXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | — | — |
Drawdowns
FALN vs. HYXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FALN drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, which is greater than HYXU's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FALN and HYXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FALN | HYXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.22% | 0.00% | -29.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | 0.00% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.32% | 0.00% | -3.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | — | — |
Volatility
FALN vs. HYXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FALN | HYXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.63% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.54% | 0.00% | +4.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.31% | 0.00% | +7.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.95% | 0.00% | +8.95% |
FALN vs. HYXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FALN has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HYXU's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FALN vs. HYXU - Dividend Comparison
FALN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.45%, while HYXU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FALN iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF | 6.45% | 6.31% | 6.24% | 5.37% | 5.08% | 3.40% | 5.14% | 5.35% | 5.97% | 6.98% | 3.55% |
HYXU iShares Euro High Yield Corporate Bond USD Hedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, FALN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FALN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HYXU.
FALN has the higher dividend yield at 6.45%, compared with 0.00% for HYXU.
FALN tracks Bloomberg US High Yield Fallen Angel 3% Capped Index, while HYXU tracks BBG Pan-European High Yield (Euro) Total Return 100% USD Hedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FALN and 0.35% for HYXU.
Find the right allocation for FALN and HYXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer