HYXU vs. IGHG
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares International High Yield Bond ETF (HYXU) and ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG).
HYXU and IGHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HYXU is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets ex-US High Yield Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2012. IGHG is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Citi Corporate Investment Grade (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 2013. Both HYXU and IGHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HYXU or IGHG.
Key characteristics
| HYXU | IGHG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.11% | 8.40% |
| 1Y Return | 11.99% | 11.27% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -0.19% | 5.83% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.17% | 4.56% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.70% | 3.69% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.57 | 2.71 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.35 | 3.88 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.28 | 1.56 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.77 | 4.33 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.36 | 20.88 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.92% | 0.55% |
| Daily Std Dev | 7.80% | 4.20% |
| Max Drawdown | -32.45% | -25.16% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.06% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYXU and IGHG is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
HYXU vs. IGHG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, HYXU achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than IGHG's 8.40% return. Over the past 10 years, HYXU has underperformed IGHG with an annualized return of 1.70%, while IGHG has yielded a comparatively higher 3.69% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HYXU vs. IGHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYXU has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IGHG's 0.30% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HYXU vs. IGHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International High Yield Bond ETF (HYXU) and ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HYXU vs. IGHG - Dividend Comparison
HYXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than IGHG's 5.07% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYXU iShares International High Yield Bond ETF | 3.28% | 3.38% | 0.61% | 3.07% | 1.45% | 1.19% | 4.01% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 3.25% | 4.55% | 5.02% |
IGHG ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged | 5.07% | 4.99% | 3.55% | 2.50% | 2.78% | 3.48% | 4.13% | 3.36% | 3.37% | 3.64% | 3.59% | 0.55% |
Drawdowns
HYXU vs. IGHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYXU drawdown since its inception was -32.45%, which is greater than IGHG's maximum drawdown of -25.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYXU and IGHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HYXU vs. IGHG - Volatility Comparison
iShares International High Yield Bond ETF (HYXU) has a higher volatility of 2.13% compared to ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG) at 1.87%. This indicates that HYXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.