FAI vs. IYK
FAI (First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF) and IYK (iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FAI is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index, while IYK is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FAI returned 72.81% vs 1.90% for IYK. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. FAI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IYK.
Performance
FAI vs. IYK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAI achieves a 36.77% return, which is significantly higher than IYK's 5.46% return.
FAI
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- 17.27%
- YTD
- 36.77%
- 6M
- 35.51%
- 1Y
- 72.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IYK
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- 5.46%
- 6M
- 5.91%
- 1Y
- 1.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.78%
- 5Y*
- 5.51%
- 10Y*
- 8.83%
FAI vs. IYK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FAI First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF | 36.77% | 33.37% | 2.06% |
IYK iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF | 5.46% | 4.78% | -4.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAI and IYK is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024 | -0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAI vs. IYK — Risk / Return Rank
FAI
IYK
FAI vs. IYK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) and iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (IYK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAI | IYK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.04 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | 0.18 | +3.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.65 | 0.38 | +12.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAI | IYK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.99 | 0.16 | +2.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.70 | 0.56 | +1.14 |
Drawdowns
FAI vs. IYK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAI drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, smaller than the maximum IYK drawdown of -42.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAI and IYK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAI | IYK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.82% | -42.64% | +14.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.84% | -10.68% | -8.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -9.10% | +6.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -5.07% | -0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.77% | 5.05% | +0.72% |
Volatility
FAI vs. IYK - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) has a higher volatility of 8.57% compared to iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (IYK) at 3.51%. This indicates that FAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAI | IYK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.57% | 3.51% | +5.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.40% | 9.29% | +10.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.47% | 12.15% | +12.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.89% | 12.98% | +16.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.89% | 15.50% | +14.39% |
FAI vs. IYK - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IYK's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAI vs. IYK - Dividend Comparison
FAI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IYK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAI First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IYK iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF | 2.69% | 2.75% | 2.63% | 2.74% | 2.16% | 1.49% | 1.42% | 2.21% | 2.81% | 1.74% | 2.63% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAI and IYK have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAI has higher volatility (8.57%) compared to IYK (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAI dropped -27.82% vs IYK's -42.64%.
On 1-year performance, FAI leads with 72.81% vs 1.90% for IYK. On fees, IYK is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, IYK has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FAI has performed better with a 72.81% return vs 1.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYK is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FAI.
IYK has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.00% for FAI.
FAI is categorized as Technology Equities, while IYK is Consumer Staples Equities. FAI tracks Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index, while IYK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FAI and 0.42% for IYK.
FAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAI and IYK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer