FAGOX vs. PNOPX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FAGOX (Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M) and PNOPX (Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FAGOX returned 21.71%/yr vs 15.00%/yr for PNOPX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAGOX charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PNOPX.

Performance

FAGOX vs. PNOPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M (FAGOX) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAGOX achieves a 15.49% return, which is significantly higher than PNOPX's 4.12% return. Over the past 10 years, FAGOX has outperformed PNOPX with an annualized return of 21.71%, while PNOPX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.00% annualized return.

FAGOX

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: 7.17%
• YTD: 15.49%
• 6M: 15.88%
• 1Y: 37.96%
• 3Y*: 30.97%
• 5Y*: 12.69%
• 10Y*: 21.71%

PNOPX

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 3.35%
• YTD: 4.12%
• 6M: 3.63%
• 1Y: 18.38%
• 3Y*: 17.22%
• 5Y*: 9.03%
• 10Y*: 15.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAGOX vs. PNOPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAGOX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M	15.49%	21.86%	38.37%	44.80%	-38.56%	11.05%	68.19%	39.94%	14.61%	34.34%
PNOPX Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund	4.12%	10.93%	22.97%	26.23%	-22.86%	23.44%	28.57%	35.86%	-0.90%	29.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FAGOX and PNOPX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1991	0.88

The correlation between FAGOX and PNOPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FAGOX vs. PNOPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAGOX

FAGOX Risk / Return Rank: 45
FAGOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FAGOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
FAGOX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
FAGOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FAGOX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

PNOPX

PNOPX Risk / Return Rank: 24
PNOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
PNOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
PNOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
PNOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
PNOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAGOX vs. PNOPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M (FAGOX) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FAGOX	PNOPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	1.52	+0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	2.14	+0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.28	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	1.43	+0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.94	5.36	+3.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FAGOX vs. PNOPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAGOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the PNOPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAGOX and PNOPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FAGOX	PNOPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.14	1.52	+0.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.52	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91	0.83	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.55	+0.05

Drawdowns

FAGOX vs. PNOPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAGOX drawdown since its inception was -65.31%, smaller than the maximum PNOPX drawdown of -74.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGOX and PNOPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAGOX	PNOPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.31%	-74.15%	+8.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.27%	-13.06%	-3.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.64%	-22.90%	-3.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.84%	-29.13%	-15.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.84%	-30.29%	-14.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.03%	-0.66%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.55%	-24.03%	+10.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.36%	3.48%	+0.88%

Volatility

FAGOX vs. PNOPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M (FAGOX) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) at 3.32%. This indicates that FAGOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PNOPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAGOX	PNOPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.69%	3.32%	+1.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.29%	9.46%	+4.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.28%	12.30%	+5.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.84%	17.36%	+7.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.89%	18.15%	+5.74%

FAGOX vs. PNOPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAGOX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than PNOPX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAGOX vs. PNOPX - Dividend Comparison

FAGOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, less than PNOPX's 10.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAGOX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M	3.64%	4.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	10.01%	5.29%	4.15%	12.10%	7.48%	15.51%	11.14%
PNOPX Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund	10.77%	11.22%	9.25%	2.96%	8.38%	11.69%	7.41%	7.14%	20.24%	4.91%	0.00%	12.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAGOX and PNOPX in my portfolio?

FAGOX and PNOPX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAGOX or PNOPX?

FAGOX has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to PNOPX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAGOX dropped -65.31% vs PNOPX's -74.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAGOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.