FAGOX vs. PNOPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M (FAGOX) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX).
FAGOX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 18, 1987. PNOPX is managed by Putnam. It was launched on Aug 31, 1990.
Performance
FAGOX vs. PNOPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAGOX vs. PNOPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGOX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M | -9.60% | 21.86% | 38.37% | 44.80% | -38.56% | 11.05% | 68.19% | 39.94% | 14.61% | 34.34% |
PNOPX Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund | -9.32% | 10.93% | 22.97% | 26.23% | -22.86% | 23.44% | 28.57% | 35.86% | -0.90% | 29.07% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FAGOX having a -9.60% return and PNOPX slightly higher at -9.32%. Over the past 10 years, FAGOX has outperformed PNOPX with an annualized return of 18.91%, while PNOPX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.72% annualized return.
FAGOX
- 1D
- 4.76%
- 1M
- -5.84%
- YTD
- -9.60%
- 6M
- -8.63%
- 1Y
- 22.40%
- 3Y*
- 24.51%
- 5Y*
- 7.64%
- 10Y*
- 18.91%
PNOPX
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- -5.88%
- YTD
- -9.32%
- 6M
- -6.62%
- 1Y
- 8.72%
- 3Y*
- 13.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAGOX vs. PNOPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAGOX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than PNOPX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAGOX vs. PNOPX — Risk / Return Rank
FAGOX
PNOPX
FAGOX vs. PNOPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M (FAGOX) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAGOX | PNOPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 0.50 | +0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.49 | 0.84 | +0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.12 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 0.74 | +0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.15 | 2.63 | +2.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAGOX | PNOPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 0.50 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.40 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.76 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.53 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAGOX and PNOPX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FAGOX vs. PNOPX - Dividend Comparison
FAGOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, less than PNOPX's 12.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGOX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M | 4.65% | 4.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.01% | 5.29% | 4.15% | 12.10% | 7.48% | 15.51% | 11.14% |
PNOPX Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund | 12.37% | 11.22% | 9.25% | 2.96% | 8.38% | 11.69% | 7.41% | 7.14% | 20.24% | 4.91% | 0.00% | 12.64% |
Drawdowns
FAGOX vs. PNOPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAGOX drawdown since its inception was -65.31%, smaller than the maximum PNOPX drawdown of -74.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGOX and PNOPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAGOX | PNOPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.31% | -74.15% | +8.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.27% | -13.06% | -3.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.84% | -29.13% | -15.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.84% | -30.29% | -14.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.29% | -10.69% | -1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.60% | -24.14% | +10.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | 3.66% | +0.86% |
Volatility
FAGOX vs. PNOPX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M (FAGOX) has a higher volatility of 8.51% compared to Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) at 5.34%. This indicates that FAGOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PNOPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAGOX | PNOPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 5.34% | +3.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.81% | 9.55% | +5.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.42% | 18.23% | +6.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.88% | 17.35% | +7.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.83% | 18.13% | +5.70% |