FAGOX vs. CMTFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M (FAGOX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX).
FAGOX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 18, 1987. CMTFX is managed by Columbia Threadneedle. It was launched on Nov 8, 2000.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FAGOX or CMTFX.
Key characteristics
| FAGOX | CMTFX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 36.63% | 30.06% |
| 1Y Return | 52.74% | 41.64% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.89% | 6.65% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 15.12% | 18.48% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 10.83% | 17.15% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.75 | 1.96 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.51 | 2.55 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.49 | 1.35 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.63 | 2.59 |
| Martin Ratio | 15.86 | 8.64 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.44% | 4.99% |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.83% | 22.00% |
| Max Drawdown | -65.31% | -68.25% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -1.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAGOX and CMTFX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FAGOX vs. CMTFX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FAGOX achieves a 36.63% return, which is significantly higher than CMTFX's 30.06% return. Over the past 10 years, FAGOX has underperformed CMTFX with an annualized return of 10.83%, while CMTFX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.15% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAGOX vs. CMTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAGOX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than CMTFX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FAGOX vs. CMTFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M (FAGOX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FAGOX vs. CMTFX - Dividend Comparison
Neither FAGOX nor CMTFX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGOX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CMTFX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.52% |
Drawdowns
FAGOX vs. CMTFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAGOX drawdown since its inception was -65.31%, roughly equal to the maximum CMTFX drawdown of -68.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGOX and CMTFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FAGOX vs. CMTFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M (FAGOX) is 5.31%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) has a volatility of 5.93%. This indicates that FAGOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.