FAGOX vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FAGOX (Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FAGOX returned 22.38%/yr vs 22.38%/yr for FBGRX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAGOX charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

FAGOX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M (FAGOX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAGOX achieves a 14.98% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 16.84% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: FAGOX at 22.38% and FBGRX at 22.38%.

FAGOX

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: 2.68%
• YTD: 14.98%
• 6M: 13.77%
• 1Y: 34.64%
• 3Y*: 30.37%
• 5Y*: 11.41%
• 10Y*: 22.38%

FBGRX

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: 2.83%
• YTD: 16.84%
• 6M: 15.60%
• 1Y: 40.72%
• 3Y*: 30.85%
• 5Y*: 15.32%
• 10Y*: 22.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAGOX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAGOX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M	14.98%	21.86%	38.37%	44.80%	-38.56%	11.05%	68.19%	39.94%	14.61%	34.34%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	16.84%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	33.43%	1.02%	36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FAGOX and FBGRX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1987	0.94

The correlation between FAGOX and FBGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FAGOX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAGOX

FAGOX Risk / Return Rank: 41
FAGOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
FAGOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FAGOX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
FAGOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
FAGOX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAGOX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M (FAGOX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAGOX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	2.23	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	2.89	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.38	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	3.31	-1.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.14	13.66	-5.51

FAGOX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAGOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAGOX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FAGOX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAGOX drawdown since its inception was -65.31%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGOX and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAGOX	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.31%	-58.64%	-6.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.27%	-12.65%	-3.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.64%	-27.07%	+0.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.84%	-43.08%	-1.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.84%	-43.08%	-1.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.47%	-2.19%	+0.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.54%	-12.51%	-1.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.44%	3.06%	+1.38%

Volatility

FAGOX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M (FAGOX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) have volatilities of 8.30% and 8.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAGOX	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.30%	8.03%	+0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.83%	14.72%	+1.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.75%	18.85%	+0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.05%	25.09%	-0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.01%	23.80%	+0.21%

FAGOX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAGOX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAGOX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FAGOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, more than FBGRX's 1.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAGOX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class M	3.66%	4.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	10.01%	5.29%	4.15%	12.10%	7.48%	15.51%	11.14%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.63%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAGOX and FBGRX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, FAGOX and FBGRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FAGOX or FBGRX?

FAGOX has higher volatility (8.30%) compared to FBGRX (8.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAGOX dropped -65.31% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.