FAGKX vs. FSKGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund Class K (FAGKX) and Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund (FSKGX).
FAGKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008. FSKGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 25, 2017.
Performance
FAGKX vs. FSKGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAGKX vs. FSKGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGKX Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund Class K | -7.23% | 3.13% | 17.83% | 21.07% | -26.41% | 21.43% | 29.49% | 36.75% | -6.77% | 9.57% |
FSKGX Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund | -7.04% | 7.82% | 20.04% | 21.58% | -26.20% | 21.62% | 29.50% | 36.90% | -6.89% | 10.43% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FAGKX having a -7.23% return and FSKGX slightly higher at -7.04%.
FAGKX
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -11.55%
- YTD
- -7.23%
- 6M
- -18.03%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- 8.03%
- 5Y*
- 4.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.61%
FSKGX
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- -11.40%
- YTD
- -7.04%
- 6M
- -14.07%
- 1Y
- 8.66%
- 3Y*
- 10.52%
- 5Y*
- 5.52%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAGKX vs. FSKGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAGKX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKGX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAGKX vs. FSKGX — Risk / Return Rank
FAGKX
FSKGX
FAGKX vs. FSKGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund Class K (FAGKX) and Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund (FSKGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAGKX | FSKGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.14 | 0.34 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.38 | 0.64 | -0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.09 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 0.26 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.03 | 0.81 | -0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAGKX | FSKGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | 0.34 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.24 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.46 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAGKX and FSKGX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FAGKX vs. FSKGX - Dividend Comparison
Neither FAGKX nor FSKGX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGKX Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund Class K | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 13.99% | 8.30% | 3.73% | 0.90% | 0.05% | 0.72% | 0.29% |
FSKGX Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.37% | 0.27% | 26.04% | 2.53% | 0.50% | 0.85% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FAGKX vs. FSKGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAGKX drawdown since its inception was -54.37%, which is greater than FSKGX's maximum drawdown of -36.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGKX and FSKGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAGKX | FSKGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.37% | -36.51% | -17.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.29% | -16.39% | -3.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.57% | -36.51% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.29% | -16.39% | -3.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.12% | -9.05% | -1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.04% | 5.28% | +1.76% |
Volatility
FAGKX vs. FSKGX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund Class K (FAGKX) and Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund (FSKGX) have volatilities of 7.61% and 7.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAGKX | FSKGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.61% | 7.62% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.93% | 15.97% | +1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.56% | 25.16% | +1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.31% | 22.82% | +0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 22.78% | -0.82% |