PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAGKX vs. FDEGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAGKX vs. FDEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund Class K (FAGKX) and Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FAGKX having a 3.69% return and FDEGX slightly lower at 3.63%. Over the past 10 years, FAGKX has underperformed FDEGX with an annualized return of 10.48%, while FDEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.15% annualized return.


FAGKX

1D
3.45%
1M
-6.65%
6M
3.58%
YTD
3.69%
1Y
-5.23%
3Y*
9.00%
5Y*
3.31%
10Y*
10.48%
ALL TIME*
8.75%

FDEGX

1D
3.45%
1M
-6.65%
6M
3.54%
YTD
3.63%
1Y
-5.46%
3Y*
11.50%
5Y*
4.68%
10Y*
11.15%
ALL TIME*
9.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FAGKX vs. FDEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAGKX
Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund Class K
3.69%3.13%17.83%21.07%-26.41%21.43%29.49%36.75%-6.77%21.07%
FDEGX
Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund
3.63%2.88%26.57%20.93%-26.50%21.30%29.34%36.59%-6.92%21.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FAGKX and FDEGX is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2008

1.00

The correlation between FAGKX and FDEGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAGKX vs. FDEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FAGKX
FAGKX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FAGKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAGKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAGKX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FAGKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAGKX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

FDEGX
FDEGX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FDEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FAGKX vs. FDEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund Class K (FAGKX) and Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAGKXFDEGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.97

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.36

-0.37

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.88

-0.89

+0.02

FAGKX vs. FDEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAGKX Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is comparable to the FDEGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAGKX and FDEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAGKX vs. FDEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAGKX drawdown since its inception was -54.37%, smaller than the maximum FDEGX drawdown of -85.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGKX and FDEGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAGKXFDEGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.37%

-85.96%

+31.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.29%

-20.45%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.00%

-26.04%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.57%

-36.62%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.57%

-36.62%

+0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.91%

-11.12%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.07%

-36.68%

+26.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.30%

8.42%

-0.12%

Volatility

FAGKX vs. FDEGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund Class K (FAGKX) and Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) have volatilities of 7.89% and 7.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAGKXFDEGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.89%

7.89%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.44%

18.45%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.99%

24.05%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.93%

23.74%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.34%

22.23%

+0.11%

FAGKX vs. FDEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAGKX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than FDEGX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAGKX vs. FDEGX - Dividend Comparison

Neither FAGKX nor FDEGX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAGKX
Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund Class K
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.16%0.00%13.99%8.30%3.73%0.90%0.05%0.72%0.29%
FDEGX
Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund
0.00%0.00%7.89%0.05%0.00%14.15%8.37%3.65%0.75%0.05%0.59%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FAGKX and FDEGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDEGX has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to FAGKX (7.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAGKX dropped -54.37% vs FDEGX's -85.96%.

FAGKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.30 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAGKX and FDEGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer