FAFDX vs. FLC
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX) and Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC).
FAFDX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996. FLC is an actively managed fund by Flaherty & Crumrine. It was launched on Aug 29, 2003.
Performance
FAFDX vs. FLC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAFDX vs. FLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAFDX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A | -9.46% | 14.91% | 39.01% | 14.03% | -8.93% | 32.90% | -0.25% | 33.77% | -16.09% | 20.17% |
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | -3.43% | 12.38% | 23.05% | -0.83% | -25.11% | 2.82% | 14.12% | 38.65% | -14.14% | 17.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAFDX achieves a -9.46% return, which is significantly lower than FLC's -3.43% return. Over the past 10 years, FAFDX has outperformed FLC with an annualized return of 12.71%, while FLC has yielded a comparatively lower 5.33% annualized return.
FAFDX
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -5.39%
- YTD
- -9.46%
- 6M
- -5.99%
- 1Y
- 4.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.02%
- 10Y*
- 12.71%
FLC
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- YTD
- -3.43%
- 6M
- -3.32%
- 1Y
- 6.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- -0.62%
- 10Y*
- 5.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAFDX vs. FLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAFDX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FLC's 1.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAFDX vs. FLC — Risk / Return Rank
FAFDX
FLC
FAFDX vs. FLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX) and Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAFDX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.25 | 0.55 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.47 | 0.75 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.14 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 0.70 | -0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.68 | 2.71 | -2.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAFDX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | 0.55 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | -0.04 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.24 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.28 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAFDX and FLC is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FAFDX vs. FLC - Dividend Comparison
FAFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.66%, more than FLC's 7.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAFDX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A | 7.66% | 6.93% | 9.59% | 2.29% | 5.93% | 4.21% | 2.47% | 1.21% | 4.00% | 0.06% | 0.21% | 0.53% |
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | 7.36% | 6.81% | 6.62% | 7.38% | 8.95% | 6.86% | 6.27% | 6.31% | 8.34% | 7.22% | 8.20% | 8.51% |
Drawdowns
FAFDX vs. FLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAFDX drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, roughly equal to the maximum FLC drawdown of -76.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAFDX and FLC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAFDX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.69% | -76.79% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.39% | -8.69% | -5.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.14% | -40.14% | +15.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.99% | -55.27% | +9.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.19% | -6.77% | -5.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.73% | -10.92% | -6.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.64% | 2.26% | +2.38% |
Volatility
FAFDX vs. FLC - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) at 4.25%. This indicates that FAFDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAFDX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 4.25% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 5.78% | +6.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.13% | 11.34% | +9.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.12% | 14.23% | +6.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.83% | 22.06% | +1.77% |