FAFCX vs. SBFAX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FAFCX (Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C) and SBFAX (1919 Financial Services Fund) are both Financials Equities funds from BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, FAFCX returned 12.27%/yr vs 8.00%/yr for SBFAX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAFCX charges 1.79%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for SBFAX.

Performance

FAFCX vs. SBFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C (FAFCX) and 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAFCX achieves a -3.81% return, which is significantly higher than SBFAX's -6.92% return. Over the past 10 years, FAFCX has outperformed SBFAX with an annualized return of 12.27%, while SBFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.00% annualized return.

FAFCX

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: -2.26%
• YTD: -3.81%
• 6M: -0.93%
• 1Y: 6.64%
• 3Y*: 21.53%
• 5Y*: 9.23%
• 10Y*: 12.27%

SBFAX

• 1D: -1.28%
• 1M: -3.45%
• YTD: -6.92%
• 6M: -4.93%
• 1Y: -3.26%
• 3Y*: 12.44%
• 5Y*: 1.62%
• 10Y*: 8.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAFCX vs. SBFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAFCX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C	-3.81%	14.05%	37.55%	13.19%	-9.63%	31.91%	-1.00%	32.80%	-16.73%	19.64%
SBFAX 1919 Financial Services Fund	-6.92%	4.29%	24.86%	1.50%	-13.99%	30.74%	0.14%	29.11%	-14.94%	14.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FAFCX and SBFAX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1999	0.92

The correlation between FAFCX and SBFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FAFCX vs. SBFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAFCX

FAFCX Risk / Return Rank: 6
FAFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
FAFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
FAFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
FAFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
FAFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

SBFAX

SBFAX Risk / Return Rank: 2
SBFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
SBFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
SBFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
SBFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
SBFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAFCX vs. SBFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C (FAFCX) and 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FAFCX	SBFAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.38	-0.29	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.62	-0.30	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	0.96	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.46	-0.37	+0.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.30	-0.86	+2.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FAFCX vs. SBFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAFCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is higher than the SBFAX Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAFCX and SBFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FAFCX	SBFAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38	-0.29	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.08	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.35	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.40	-0.13

Drawdowns

FAFCX vs. SBFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAFCX drawdown since its inception was -76.00%, which is greater than SBFAX's maximum drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAFCX and SBFAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAFCX	SBFAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.00%	-49.33%	-26.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.19%	-11.03%	-2.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.53%	-16.41%	-3.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.75%	-33.94%	+8.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.01%	-43.58%	-2.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.72%	-9.74%	+3.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.80%	-9.52%	-9.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.67%	4.76%	-0.09%

Volatility

FAFCX vs. SBFAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C (FAFCX) and 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) have volatilities of 3.60% and 3.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAFCX	SBFAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.60%	3.58%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.89%	10.18%	+1.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.94%	14.24%	+1.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.03%	19.34%	+1.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.81%	22.82%	+0.99%

FAFCX vs. SBFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAFCX has a 1.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SBFAX's 1.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAFCX vs. SBFAX - Dividend Comparison

FAFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%, less than SBFAX's 15.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAFCX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C	6.93%	6.67%	9.04%	1.58%	5.50%	3.78%	1.85%	0.45%	3.33%	0.00%	0.01%	0.28%
SBFAX 1919 Financial Services Fund	15.59%	14.51%	10.60%	10.93%	2.40%	4.83%	5.09%	3.84%	1.58%	0.00%	2.93%	7.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAFCX and SBFAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, FAFCX and SBFAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FAFCX or SBFAX?

FAFCX has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to SBFAX (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAFCX dropped -76.00% vs SBFAX's -49.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.